Response title
This is preview!
- Screen name: Mark Thomson
Mark Thomson's Profile
2 Posts
3 Responses
0
Followers
Activity Trend
Last 30 days
- Last 30 days
- Date Interval
From Date : To Date :
Loading Chart...
Show:
- Expanded view
- List view
Private Message
- 21-Sep-2013 02:44 PM
- Forum: Using jQuery Plugins
I'm seeing several second response times from the code.jquery.com. Completely unsuitable for production use. As far as I can tell there is no google-hosted version. Is there a reason for that?- While debugging a problem I was having with the jQuery UI datepicker, I ran into a problem apparently caused by the way datepicker uses the class 'hasDatepicker'.E.g. if I have something like -
- jQuery('input.date_field').datepicker()
the class 'hasDatepicker' gets added to the selected field. However if I subsequently remove the field from the page temporarily, e.g. something like -- content = jQuery('#form_container').html()
- jQuery('#form_container').html("...something else...")
and later put it back -- jQuery('#form_container').html(content)
the datepicker is no longer attached to the field, so I have to call datepicker() on the fields again. However, it seems that doing so has no effect if the field already has the class 'hasDatapicker' - which it does. So I actually have to remove the class before I call datepicker() -- jQuery('input.date_field').removeClass('hasDatepicker').datepicker()
This is a fairly minor inconvenience, as long as you know about it, but afaik it's not documented. Should this be considered a bug?- «Prev
- Next »
Moderate user : Mark Thomson
