This is how the new version of interface works - very nice and I think it would work great for this too.
[-Stash-] wrote: > > I like this idea but for one point. If you do want everything, then you > have 8 bazillion requests back and forth to the server. Not a problem for > those of us on broadband, but on Dialup it becomes a a really show stopper > with all the added latency. > > Some method of bundling up (and compressing if possible, but that's > secondary) all the necessary JS files into a single download would be > best. > > Luke > > > Sam Collett wrote: >> >> On 24/01/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> [-Stash-] wrote: >>> > Unfortunately, it looks like Cody's giving up on ThickBox. He's put >>> out a >>> > request for someone to take it over: >>> > >>> http://codylindley.com/thickboxforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=166&page=1#Item_15 >>> > >>> > Given the improvements Klaus Hartl's already made to ThickBox 2.1, it >>> would >>> > be nice if he took it over ;) >>> >>> I'd love to do that! >>> >>> -- Klaus >> >> We all know you are capable of doing it. >> >> One suggestion though - make it modular. So if you only want to use it >> for images, you don't download all the things you don't need. >> >> e.g. >> - Images, inline content - include thickbox.js >> - Gallery - thickbox.js, thickbox-gallery.js >> - Ajax: thickbox.js, thickbox-ajax.js >> - Rich media content (flash, quicktime, pdf's etc) - thickbox.js, >> thickbox-media.js >> >> and so on. >> >> You could use blockUI for the overlay and bgiframe for rich media. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Thickbox-incompatible-with-jQuery-1.1-tf3063738.html#a8573334 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
