Just to clarify: jQuery is Dual-Licensed. This means that you (as the user) can pick which license you wish to respect. Personally, the MIT license has the least amount of crazy attached to it, and is the easiest to follow - so you should probably follow that one.
--John On 2/6/07, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks! > > > Quote: halfer > >Under the GPL, I think you would need need to if you are packaging up your > >site and distributing it. But if it is a web site that you are hosting (even > >if you are selling subscriptions/memberships) then this does not count as > >distribution and so you would not need to license your site at all. > > >The MIT license appears to be much more flexible and gives you the freedom > >to distribute without making your site available under the same license in > >turn. But you do have to retain certain copyright notices (and in any case > >it is polite to give credit where it is due anyway :-). > > >That's my understanding, just remember I am not a legal eagle! > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
