They must have pulled bulets and numbering over from word :) --->N > > Kinda makes you wonder what those microsoft engineers smoke, eh? > > I had a complex css scenario as well, but with some > significant reworking was able to make it all work. I learned > some new curse words in the process, but it eventually worked. > > If you're stuck with hasLayout and you absolutely must use an > ordered list, the only solution I can think of is Kaus and Jonathan's. > > Good luck! > > > > On 2/6/07, Joel Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:33:46PM -0800, Briz wrote: > > Hi there. I recently ran into this exact same problem > and tore out what > > remained of my hair figuring it out. > > > > The problem is not with jQuery or JavaScript, but > with IE allowing CSS to > > affect how it handles the numbering of ordered list items. > > > > Here's a page describing the problem: > > http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html#list > [...] > > Yikes! Thanks for pointing this out! > > Since I'm making this OL sortable using Interface, and > it in turn > puts styles on the OL to make it drag/droppable, adding fx, etc. > So I'm probably doomed. :| > > OK, then, unnumbered lists here I come... Unless someone else > has a brainstorm! > > (FYI, I did make a scaled-down example with no styles on the OL, > and the code I provided earlier worked fine on IE adding items > that were numbered correctly. But then adding styles back > to the OL had either the effect of the numbers not appearing > or the numbers always being #1.) > > I thank you. My hair thanks you. > > Joel Noble > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > > > -- > _____________________________________ > Brad Brizendine > CTO, Glyphix http://www.glyphix.com/ >
_______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
