Like pseudo packages/namespaces. --Erik
On 3/14/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel MacDonald schrieb: > > It seems the former opens up the door to unintended closures. What are the > > benefits of doing it this way as opposed to the traditional non-jQuery way? > > > Thats it! By putting everything into a single global object, there isn't > the chance of colliding with other libraries or global objects in general. > > Mike answered the other issue :-) > > -- > Jörn Zaefferer > > http://bassistance.de > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
