haha, thanks... -GTG
On 8/4/07, Mitchell Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ganeshji: > > > > Very nice story! I really enjoyed reading it. And learned what I already > suspected. You just saved me a LOT of wasted time checking out those other > frameworks. > > > > Mitch > > > > PS In some ways its unfortunate, not terrible, just too bad, that jQuery > choose such a techie and obscure name to describe itself. It's not just that > you got to call it "j" and then "query". And it's not just that the word > query is hard to pronounce on its own: say "kweer-ee" really fast. You sound > like a Disney character. The reason is that no one knows it means. Of course > us techie's do. Mootools is a silly name but at least you a) can pronounce > it and b) know it's some kind of tool. I'm not suggesting a name change, > just pointing out what I think will hold it back. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Ganeshji Marwaha > *Sent:* Saturday, August 04, 2007 10:47 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [jQuery] Re: Jquery Vs. Prototype > > > > brook, > > > > I am not sure if i will add substantially to what others have said above. > Still, i wanted to post this mail anyways because you might be more > comfortable making a decision if you hear an opinion from a normal user as > opposed to a core developer. > > > > >
