Using new v1.1.4 :has() syntax ...
$('#rank-products table.product-table
tr:has(table)>:first-child').addClass(....);
Excellent!
Come to think of it, this approach is possible with the deprecated
syntax, too:
$('#rank-products table.product-table tr[table]>:first-
child').addClass(....);
--Karl
_________________
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Aug 25, 2007, at 3:56 AM, Wizzud wrote:
Brandon-38 wrote:
Ugh. LOL. I think I'll just change the DOM, it may be easier that
way. Thanks, Karl.
Brandon
On Aug 24, 10:13 pm, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 24, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Brandon wrote:
Here's the basic HTML:
<snip>
the :first-child matches the child table as well, which won't
work for
me. Is there a way to exclude nested tables?
-Brandon
Well, technically it's matching the table cell within the the child
table, not the child table. But I get what you're saying.
To avoid that, you could add a filter that checks to see if the <td>
has only one ancestor <table> element (in other words, the <td>
isn't
in a nested table). Try this:
jQuery('#rank-products td:first-child').filter(function() {
return $(this).parents('table').length == 1;
}).addClass('rank-handle');
- Karl
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Broken-Selector-
Help-tf4326055s15494.html#a12323989
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
