On 10/4/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder, Why do I feel like a proud papa every time I see jQuery in the > wild? It's silly -- I haven't contributed a single line of code and yet I > had a big grin on my face looking through the .js files on that site. I can > only imagine how John feels. Must be a rush.
It's always fun being on the "winning" team :-) - jake > > > --Karl > _________________ > Karl Swedberg > www.englishrules.com > www.learningjquery.com > > > > > > > > On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Sam Collett wrote: > > > It's good that they are using it quite a bit. There are some site that > use it, but only $(document).ready to call a function that manipulates > the DOM the old fashioned way. > > On 4 Oct, 08:23, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow! Very awesome :-) > > It looks like they're getting a pretty good coverage of features, too. > (DOM Manipulation, animations, events, etc.) > > --John > > On 10/4/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Looks like nbc.com is heavily into the jQuery love now, using 1.1.4.1 on > their site. Looks like they're using Interface and Mike Alsup's Media > plugin, and Klaus Hartl's cookie plugin. Also, pulling in some data with > $.ajax, doing some accordion stuff, etc.. They could be using the > > > This line appears in > http://www.nbc.com/assets/js/global/nbc.com.jsright after > all of the jQuery code: > > > // Legacy crap ---------> > > > Pretty funny. > > > Here's another file you might want to poke around in: > > > http://www.nbc.com/assets/js/video/fun.js > > > --Karl > _________________ > Karl Swedberg > www.englishrules.com > www.learningjquery.com > > >
