Skip to content

Commit 21cd51e

Browse files
committed
[css2] Issue 145
from http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1 --HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3A73dc7c4b-06e6-40f3-b4f7-9ed1dbc14bfc/trunk%403042
1 parent 7f0ef87 commit 21cd51e

1 file changed

Lines changed: 5 additions & 3 deletions

File tree

css2/visuren.src

Lines changed: 5 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
11
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
22
<html lang="en">
3-
<!-- $Id: visuren.src,v 2.165 2010-09-29 15:52:02 bbos Exp $ -->
3+
<!-- $Id: visuren.src,v 2.166 2010-10-05 19:26:22 bbos Exp $ -->
44
<head>
55
<title>Visual formatting model</title>
66
<meta name="editor" lang="tr" content="Tantek &Ccedil;elik">
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ for the DIV above) has a block-level box inside it (such as the P
176176
above), then we force it to have <em>only</em> block-level boxes
177177
inside it.
178178

179-
<p>When an inline box contains an in-flow block box, the inline box
179+
<p>When an inline box contains an in-flow block-level box, the inline box
180180
(and its inline ancestors within the same line box) are broken around
181181
the block-level box. The line boxes before the break and after the
182182
break are enclosed in anonymous block boxes, and the block-level box
@@ -2106,7 +2106,9 @@ language map to this algorithm.
21062106
</p>
21072107
<p>User agents that support bidirectional text must apply the Unicode
21082108
bidirectional algorithm to every sequence of inline-level boxes uninterrupted
2109-
by a forced line break or block boundary. This sequence forms the
2109+
by a forced (<a
2110+
href="http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/#Bidirectional_Character_Types">bidi
2111+
class&nbsp;B</a>) break or block boundary. This sequence forms the
21102112
"paragraph" unit in the bidirectional algorithm. The paragraph embedding
21112113
level is set according to the value of the <span
21122114
class="propinst-direction">'direction'</span> property of the containing

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)