Dealt with some issues. Clean up formatting. (date: 2003/07/16 22:33:41)

Author: dbaron

css3-syntax/issues.txt

@@ -1,60 +1,51 @@
 
-http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/css3-naming/
-css-style-attr?
+ISSUES COMPLETED OR NOTED IN SPEC:
 
+  http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/css3-naming/
+  css-style-attr?
 
-Note to self:  need to add to syntax draft:
- * @namespace stuff
- * Bert's extensions stuff
- [ * grammar of style attribute? -- NO, separate draft ]
+  Note to self:  need to add to syntax draft:
+   * @namespace stuff
+   * Bert's extensions stuff
+   [ * grammar of style attribute? -- NO, separate draft ]
 
-How should grammar connect to selectors?
+  How should grammar connect to selectors?
 
-Should , be in selectors or in grammar / C&I?
+  (Should , be in selectors or in grammar / C&I?)
 
-Does C&I specify use of selectors draft correctly?
-
-Should we allow nested @-rules within @media?
-
-=====
-
-See Bj�rn H�hrmann's 2001-09-19 post and thread following:
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2001Sep/thread.html#36
+  Should we allow nested @-rules within @media?
 
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Mar/0021.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JanMar/0383.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2001AprJun/0281.html
   http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138415
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002AprJun/0170.html
-
-  Should the parsing rules be looser for unknown pseudos?
-
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2001OctDec/0006.html
-
+ISSUES REMAINING:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002JulSep/thread.html#294
-
   Steven Pemberton's message about parseable sequences of tokens:
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002OctDec/0249.html
-
+    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2002OctDec/0249.html
   untokenizable / unparseable sequences:
     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Nov/0014.html
-
   missing whitespace:
     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2002Nov/0012.html
-
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Feb/0103.html
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Feb/0102.html
+  <Hixie_> dbaron: just looking at css3-syntax -- i don't think the
+	grammar covers the fact that unquoted contents of url() forms must
+	have balanced {}, [], and () characters.  also i may be mistaken but
+	i don't see a token for unquoted 'font-family's.
+  Chris Lilley's Comments in thread
+    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2003JanMar/thread.html#193
+  Vendor identifier issues:
+    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Feb/thread.html#151
+
+  See Bj�rn H�hrmann's 2001-09-19 post and thread following:
+    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2001Sep/thread.html#36
+  Should the parsing rules be looser for unknown pseudos?
+  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2001OctDec/0006.html
 
-[09:41:31] <Hixie_> dbaron: just looking at css3-syntax -- i don't think the grammar covers the fact that unquoted contents of url() forms must have balanced {}, [], and () characters.
-[09:42:22] <Hixie_> also i may be mistaken but i don't see a token for unquoted 'font-family's.
-
-Chris Lilley's Comments in thread
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2003JanMar/thread.html#193
-
-Vendor identifier issues:
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Feb/thread.html#151
-
-Other modules:
+ISSUES IN OTHER MODULES:
   Selectors draft should list terminology change in the changes section.
   Definition of 'font-size' in fonts module.
   "\A" in generated content
+  Does C&I specify use of selectors draft correctly?