Skip to content

Commit 57b781f

Browse files
committed
[css3-conditional] Update the disposition of comments to list commenters, add followups to issue 8, and add issue 9.
1 parent b6ddfb9 commit 57b781f

1 file changed

Lines changed: 20 additions & 1 deletion

File tree

css3-conditional/doc-20121213-LCWD.txt

Lines changed: 20 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2,53 +2,72 @@
22
Issue 1:
33
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0224.html
44
improve examples
5+
Raised By: Ben Callahan
56
Resolution: Editorial, but will improve examples.
67
Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/06244e910e27
78
Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0231.html
89

910
Issue 2:
1011
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0277.html
1112
@supports not( without space
13+
Raised By: Simon Pieters
1214
Resolution: require spaces, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0330.html
1315
Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/34b185ae3bac
1416
Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0232.html
1517

1618
Issue 3:
1719
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0070.html
1820
What does @supports return when the OS prevents the support?
21+
Raised By: James Nurthen
1922
Resolution: user and system preferences do not affect what @supports returns; it's only about UA capabilities, and must be the same as declaration fallback. So add a clarification of this, but no substantive change. (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
2023
Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/6e5d9a1539bd
2124
Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0233.html
2225

2326
Issue 4:
2427
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0436.html
2528
@supports all
29+
Raised by: Nicholas Shanks
2630
Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0442.html
2731
Resolution: no change, per rationale in reply (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
2832
Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0234.html
2933

3034
Issue 5:
3135
Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to Issue 7
3236
also raised as first issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
37+
Raised by: David Baron, Florian Rivoal
3338
Proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0229.html
3439
Florian agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
3540

3641
Issue 6 (prior to LC publication):
3742
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0014.html
3843
review of the new grammar for @supports
44+
Raised by: Florian Rivoal
3945
Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html
4046
Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
4147
Resolution: Already fixed prior to LC; commenter agrees.
4248

4349
Issue 7 (prior to LC publication):
44-
Raised in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
50+
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
51+
Raised by: Arthur Barstow
4552
Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
4653
(3 points accepted, 1 rejected)
4754
No response from commenter.
4855

4956
Issue 8:
5057
second issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
5158
serialization of supports_rule (forgot to edit in previous resolution)
59+
Raised By: Florian Rivoal
5260
Resolution: third resolution in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0749.html
5361
Fixed in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/7dace721dff3
5462
Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0235.html
63+
Additional clarification requested in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0237.html
64+
Additional clarification added in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/37491845e530
65+
Additional reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0238.html
66+
67+
Issue 9:
68+
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0236.html
69+
confusing to have OR in one place and AND and NOT in another
70+
Raised by: Björn Höhrmann
71+
Assumed editorial
72+
Fixed in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/139db90ee7b2
73+
Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0239.html

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)