[css3-conditional] Fill in more of disposition of comments.

Author: dbaron

css3-conditional/doc-20121213-LCWD.txt

@@ -3,31 +3,49 @@ Issue 1:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0224.html
 improve examples
 Resolution: Editorial, but will improve examples.
+Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/06244e910e27
+Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0231.html
 
 Issue 2:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0277.html
 @supports not( without space
 Resolution: require spaces, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0330.html
+Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/34b185ae3bac
+Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0232.html
 
 Issue 3:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0070.html
 What does @supports return when the OS prevents the support?
 Resolution: user and system preferences do not affect what @supports returns; it's only about UA capabilities, and must be the same as declaration fallback.  So add a clarification of this, but no substantive change.  (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
+Fixed in: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/6e5d9a1539bd
+Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0233.html
 
 Issue 4:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0436.html
 @supports all
 Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0442.html
 Resolution: no change, per rationale in reply  (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
+Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0234.html
 
 Issue 5:
-Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to
-http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
-http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
+Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to Issue 7
+also raised as first issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
+Proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0229.html
+Florian agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
 
-Issue 6:
+Issue 6 (prior to LC publication):
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0014.html
 review of the new grammar for @supports
-maybe addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html
-
-
+Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html
+Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
+Resolution: Already fixed prior to LC; commenter agrees.
+
+Issue 7 (prior to LC publication):
+Raised in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
+Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
+(3 points accepted, 1 rejected)
+No response from commenter.
+
+Issue 8:
+second issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
+serialization of supports_rule