@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=status-of-this-document>Status of this
183183 <!--end-status-->
184184
185185 < p > This functionality described in this WD is scaled down compared to
186- earler versions. The remaining functionality is considered to be useful,
186+ earlier versions. The remaining functionality is considered to be useful,
187187 to fit well into the CSS framework, and to be within reach of
188188 implementations. Indeed, significant parts of the draft has already been
189189 implemented.
@@ -1236,7 +1236,7 @@ <h3 id=the-footnote-area><span class=secno>5.2. </span>The footnote area</h3>
12361236 appears at the bottom of the page, but it can be positioned in other
12371237 places.
12381238
1239- < p class =issue > Should the footnote are be positiond using page floats or
1239+ < p class =issue > Should the footnote are be positioned using page floats or
12401240 (fixed?) absolute positioning? Or both?
12411241
12421242 < p class =issue >
@@ -1345,7 +1345,9 @@ <h3 id=the-footnote-area><span class=secno>5.2. </span>The footnote area</h3>
13451345 < p > The result of this code is a footnote area separated from other content
13461346 above it by margin, border and padding. Only 4em of the border is visible
13471347 due to the ‘< code class =property > border-clip</ code > ’
1348- property, which is defin [[!CSS4BACKGROUND]].
1348+ property, which is defined in < a
1349+ href ="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-background/ "> CSS Backgrounds and
1350+ Borders Module Level 4</ a > . <!--[[!CSS4BACKGROUND]]--> .
13491351 </ div >
13501352 <!--
13511353<p class="issue">Footnotes in tables and floats may be problematic. In
0 commit comments