@@ -746,31 +746,23 @@ The <code>CSSScopeRule</code> interface</h3>
746746 <pre class='idl' export>
747747 [Exposed=Window]
748748 interface CSSScopeRule : CSSGroupingRule {
749- readonly attribute CSSOMString start;
750- readonly attribute CSSOMString end;
749+ readonly attribute CSSOMString? start;
750+ readonly attribute CSSOMString? end;
751751 };
752752 </pre>
753753
754754 <dl class='idl-attributes'>
755755 <dt><code> start</code> of type <code> CSSOMString</code>
756- <dd> The <code> start</code> attribute must return a value as follows:
757-
758- <dl class="switch">
759- <dt data-md> The ''@scope'' rule has an associated <<scope-start>>
760- <dd data-md> The result of serializing that <<scope-start>> .
761- <dt data-md> Otherwise
762- <dd data-md> An empty string.
763- </dl>
756+ <dd> The <code> start</code> attribute
757+ returns the result of serializing the <<scope-start>> of the rule
758+ (without the enclosing parentheses),
759+ or null if there is no <<scope-start>> .
764760
765761 <dt><code> end</code> of type <code> CSSOMString</code>
766- <dd> The <code> end</code> attribute must return a value as follows:
767-
768- <dl class="switch">
769- <dt data-md> The ''@scope'' rule has an associated <<scope-end>>
770- <dd data-md> The result of serializing that <<scope-end>> .
771- <dt data-md> Otherwise
772- <dd data-md> An empty string.
773- </dl>
762+ <dd> The <code> end</code> attribute
763+ returns the result of serializing the <<scope-end>> of the rule
764+ (without the enclosing parentheses),
765+ or null if there is no <<scope-end>> .
774766 </dl>
775767
776768<!--
@@ -804,6 +796,7 @@ Changes since the 21 December 2021 First Public Working Draft</h3>
804796 (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6895">Issue 6895</a> )
805797
806798 * Added the {{CSSScopeRule}} interface.
799+ (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8626">Issue 8626</a> )
807800
808801 * Added implicit scopes by making ''<<scope-start>>'' optional.
809802 (<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6606">Issue 6606</a> )
0 commit comments