[css2] Issue 49 wasn't completely applied.

bert-github · bert-github · commit 04c7ce4fa509 · 2009-01-29T15:34:43.000Z
http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-49 --HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3A73dc7c4b-06e6-40f3-b4f7-9ed1dbc14bfc/trunk%402876
diff --git a/css2/fonts.src b/css2/fonts.src
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
 <html lang="en">
-<!-- $Id: fonts.src,v 2.91 2008-11-26 15:05:03 bbos Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Id: fonts.src,v 2.92 2009-01-29 15:34:43 bbos Exp $ -->
 <head>
 <title>Fonts</title>
 <meta name="editor" lang="tr" content="Tantek &Ccedil;elik">
@@ -535,17 +535,10 @@ will be no less dark than the faces of lighter values.
 </p>
 
 <div id="compute-font-weight">
-<p>
-  The computed value of "font-weight" is either:
-</p>
-<ul>
-<li>one of the legal number values, or </li>
-<li>one of the legal number values combined with one or more of the
-    relative values (bolder or lighter). This type of computed values
-    is necessary to use when the font in question does not have all
-    weight variations that are needed. 
-</li>
-</ul>
+<p>Note: A set of nested elements that mix 'bolder' and 'lighter' will
+give unpredictable results depending on the UA, OS, and font
+availability. This behavior will be more precisely defined in CSS3.
+
 <p>
   CSS 2.1 does not specify how the computed value of font-weight is
   represented internally or externally.
