Skip to content

Commit 3b4c8d1

Browse files
committed
[css-overflow] Add issue about rewriting these definitions.
1 parent 42d5069 commit 3b4c8d1

2 files changed

Lines changed: 23 additions & 6 deletions

File tree

css-overflow/Overview.html

Lines changed: 13 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -435,14 +435,22 @@ <h3 id=scrollable-overflow><span class=secno>2.2. </span>Scrollable
435435
the set of things extending outside of that box's padding edge for which a
436436
scrolling mechanism needs to be provided.
437437

438+
<p class=issue> The following definition should be rewritten to use the
439+
concept of <a
440+
href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transforms/#3d-rendering-context">3D
441+
rendering context</a> <a
442+
href="#ref-CSS3-TRANSFORMS">[CSS3-TRANSFORMS]<!--{{!CSS3-TRANSFORMS}}--></a>
443+
and related terms, particularly once those concepts stabilize following
444+
changes proposed in the CSS WG meeting on the morning of 2014-01-28.
445+
438446
<p> Given the following definitions <span class=issue>which belong in <a
439447
href="#ref-CSS3-TRANSFORMS">[CSS3-TRANSFORMS]<!--{{CSS3-TRANSFORMS}}--></a></span>:
440448

441449
<dl>
442450
<dt><dfn id=d-preserving-child>3d-preserving child</dfn>
443451

444-
<dd> A child box C of a parent box P is a 3d-preserving child if it has
445-
<code class=css>transform-style: preserve-3d</code>’ and the
452+
<dd> A child box B of a containing block C is a 3d-preserving child if it
453+
has <code class=css>transform-style: preserve-3d</code>’ and the
446454
user-agent is not required to flatten it based on the <a
447455
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transforms/#transform-style-property">requirements</a>
448456
in <a
@@ -456,8 +464,9 @@ <h3 id=scrollable-overflow><span class=secno>2.2. </span>Scrollable
456464
<dt><dfn id=d-preserving-descendant>3d-preserving descendant</dfn>
457465

458466
<dd> Box D is a 3d-preserving descendant of box A if A is an ancestor of
459-
D, and D and all of the boxes (if any) in the ancestor chain from D to A
460-
are <a href="#d-preserving-child"><i>3d-preserving child</i></a> boxes.
467+
D, and D and all of the boxes (if any) in the containing block chain from
468+
D to A are <a href="#d-preserving-child"><i>3d-preserving child</i></a>
469+
boxes.
461470
</dl>
462471

463472
<p>The scrollable overflow of a box is the union of the following things,

css-overflow/Overview.src.html

Lines changed: 10 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -313,6 +313,14 @@ <h3 id="scrollable-overflow">Scrollable overflow</h3>
313313
for which a scrolling mechanism needs to be provided.
314314
</p>
315315

316+
<p class="issue">
317+
The following definition should be rewritten to use
318+
the concept of <a href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transforms/#3d-rendering-context">3D rendering context</a> [[!CSS3-TRANSFORMS]]
319+
and related terms,
320+
particularly once those concepts stabilize following changes
321+
proposed in the CSS WG meeting on the morning of 2014-01-28.
322+
</p>
323+
316324
<p>
317325
Given the following definitions
318326
<span class="issue">which belong in [[CSS3-TRANSFORMS]]</span>:
@@ -321,7 +329,7 @@ <h3 id="scrollable-overflow">Scrollable overflow</h3>
321329
<dl>
322330
<dt><dfn>3d-preserving child</dfn></dt>
323331
<dd>
324-
A child box C of a parent box P is a 3d-preserving
332+
A child box B of a containing block C is a 3d-preserving
325333
child if it has ''transform-style: preserve-3d''
326334
and the user-agent is not required to flatten it
327335
based on the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transforms/#transform-style-property">requirements</a> in [[!CSS3-TRANSFORMS]].
@@ -335,7 +343,7 @@ <h3 id="scrollable-overflow">Scrollable overflow</h3>
335343
<dd>
336344
Box D is a 3d-preserving descendant of box A if A is
337345
an ancestor of D, and D and all of the boxes (if any)
338-
in the ancestor chain from D to A
346+
in the containing block chain from D to A
339347
are <i>3d-preserving child</i> boxes.
340348
</dd>
341349
</dl>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)