[css2] Added issue 34 (assumed editorial).

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : svn%3A73dc7c4b-06e6-40f3-b4f7-9ed1dbc14bfc/trunk%402673

Author: bert-github

css2/issues/issues-4

@@ -768,3 +768,39 @@ Resolution:
 
 =Bert= Edit.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Issue 34.
+URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2007AprJun/0063.html
+Description: 
+
+  Elika writes:
+
+    [...] the third paragraph of 10.6.2 states the
+    same thing, essentially, three times:
+
+       # If 'height' and 'width' both have computed values of 'auto' and
+       #   the element has no intrinsic height, but does have an intrinsic
+       #   width and intrinsic ratio;
+       # or if 'height' has a computed value of 'auto', and the element
+       #   does have an intrinsic ratio;
+       # or if 'height' and 'width' both have computed values of 'auto' and
+       #  the element has an intrinsic ratio but no intrinsic height or
+       #  width and the containing block's width doesn't itself depend on
+       #  the replaced element's width;
+       # then the used value of 'height' is:
+
+    I think we can replace all that with
+
+       | Otherwise if 'height' has a computed value of 'auto' and the
+       | element does have an intrinsic ratio then the used value of
+       | 'height' is:
+
+    since that second case covers the other two.
+
+  Bert agrees and thinks this is editorial.
+
+Resolution:
+
+  Assumed editorial.
+
+=Bert= Edit.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------