Skip to content

Commit 532ea13

Browse files
committed
[css2] update
--HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3A73dc7c4b-06e6-40f3-b4f7-9ed1dbc14bfc/trunk%402667
1 parent 5e030f0 commit 532ea13

1 file changed

Lines changed: 18 additions & 21 deletions

File tree

css2/issues/issues-4

Lines changed: 18 additions & 21 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -37,8 +37,9 @@ Proposal:
3737
said element may become narrower."
3838

3939
Resolution:
40+
Proposal accepted.
4041

41-
=dbaron= Propose text.
42+
=Bert= Edit.
4243
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4344
Issue 3.
4445
URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0065.html
@@ -65,14 +66,20 @@ Description:
6566

6667
Proposal:
6768

68-
Leave spec as-is and continue with image-scaling in CSS3.
69+
Leave spec as-is and continue with image-scaling in CSS3. Add note:
70+
71+
Note: In cases where an explicit width or height is set and the other
72+
dimension is auto, applying a minimum or maximum constraint on the
73+
auto side causes an over-constrained situation. The spec is clear in
74+
the behavior but it might not be what the author expects. The CSS3
75+
image-fit property can be used to obtain different results in this
76+
situation.
6977

7078
Resolution:
7179

7280
No normative change, add warning note to authors.
7381

74-
=Markus= Draft note about interoperability troubles and discouraging authors
75-
from using this corner case.
82+
=Bert= Edit.
7683
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7784
Issue 5.
7885
URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Nov/0049.html
@@ -651,24 +658,11 @@ Original proposal from MS:
651658

652659
Alternate proposal from Hyatt:
653660

654-
Change the following in section 9.5.2:
655-
656-
"If the element's top border edge has not passed the relevant floats, then
657-
its clearance is set to the amount necessary to place the border edge of
658-
the block even with the bottom outer edge of the lowest float that must be
659-
cleared."
661+
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2007JanMar/0512.html
660662

661-
to:
663+
Alternate proposal from Ian:
662664

663-
"If the element's top border edge has not passed the relevant floats, then
664-
its clearance is set to the amount necessary to place the border edge of
665-
the block even with the bottom outer edge of the lowest float that must be
666-
cleared. The space consumed by the previous collapsed margins, the
667-
clearance, and the collapsed margins between the clearance and the border
668-
edge of the block cannot be less than the space that would have been
669-
consumed by all of the collapsed margins up to the border edge of the block
670-
if no clearance had occurred. The clearance is increased such that the two
671-
distances match when this situation occurs."
665+
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2007JanMar/0535.html
672666

673667
Alternate proposal from Ian/Elika:
674668
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2007JanMar/0538.html
@@ -769,6 +763,9 @@ David's Proposal:
769763
Ian Agrees:
770764
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Apr/0014
771765

772-
=WG= Discuss.
766+
Resolution:
767+
Proposal accepted.
768+
769+
=Bert= Edit.
773770

774771
------------------------------------------------------------------------

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)