@@ -3848,106 +3848,105 @@ Issue closed.
38483848Issue 188.
38493849URI: http://www.w3.org/mid/20060602211506.GA28317@ridley.dbaron.org
38503850Description:
3851- should empty-cells affect layout
3851+ should empty-cells affect layout
38523852Resolution:
3853- No Change
3853+ No Change
38543854Issue closed.
38553855------------------------------------------------------------------------
38563856Issue 189.
38573857URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0036.html
38583858Description:
3859- Ambiguity in interpreting max-height/max-width when either width or
3860- height (but not both) is set.
3859+ Ambiguity in interpreting max-height/max-width when either width or
3860+ height (but not both) is set.
38613861Resolution:
38623862
3863- Change text in 10.4, so that constraint table applies as soon as
3864- either width or height is auto, as follows: "However, for replaced
3865- elements with an intrinsic ratio and at least one value of 'height'
3866- or 'width' specified as 'auto', the algorithm is as follows:"
3863+ Change text in 10.4, so that constraint table applies as soon as
3864+ either width or height is auto, as follows: "However, for replaced
3865+ elements with an intrinsic ratio and at least one value of 'height'
3866+ or 'width' specified as 'auto', the algorithm is as follows:"
38673867
3868- Plus analogous change in 10.7.
3868+ Plus analogous change in 10.7.
38693869
38703870=Bert= Edit.
38713871------------------------------------------------------------------------
38723872Issue 190.
38733873URI:
38743874Description:
3875- br style rule in sample HTML style sheet needs "white-space: pre"
3875+ br style rule in sample HTML style sheet needs "white-space: pre"
38763876Resolution:
38773877Issue closed.
38783878------------------------------------------------------------------------
38793879Issue 191.
38803880URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0049.html
3881- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0157.html
3881+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0157.html
38823882Description:
3883- Appendix E wording for painting canvas background is not very clear.
3883+ Appendix E wording for painting canvas background is not very clear.
38843884Resolution:
3885- "unclipped" should be "over the entire canvas" as with point 1, and
3886- "painted at" should be "anchored at"
3885+ "unclipped" should be "over the entire canvas" as with point 1, and
3886+ "painted at" should be "anchored at"
38873887
38883888=Bert= Edit.
38893889------------------------------------------------------------------------
38903890Issue 192.
38913891URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0049.html
3892- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0157.html
3892+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0157.html
38933893Description:
38943894 Appendix E wording (Paragraph starting "for each element in each line
38953895 box") for painting inlines is not very clear.
38963896Proposals:
3897-
3898- Replace
3899- 1. For each element in each line box of the element, in tree order, if
3900- any, or if the element is inline-level (note that all elements in line
3901- boxes are forcably inline-level), on a per-line-box basis:
3902- with
3903- 1. For each element in each line box of the element (if any), in tree
3904- order; or if the element is inline-level (note that all elements in line
3905- boxes are forcibly inline-level), on a per-line-box basis:
3906- or
3907- 1. For each line box of the box (outer loop), and then for each box, in
3908- tree order, in that line box (inner loop):
3909- or
3910- 1. Taking each line box of the box in order, for each box (in tree order)
3911- in that line box:
3912- or
3913- ???
3897+ Replace
3898+ 1. For each element in each line box of the element, in tree order, if
3899+ any, or if the element is inline-level (note that all elements in line
3900+ boxes are forcably inline-level), on a per-line-box basis:
3901+ with
3902+ 1. For each element in each line box of the element (if any), in tree
3903+ order; or if the element is inline-level (note that all elements in line
3904+ boxes are forcibly inline-level), on a per-line-box basis:
3905+ or
3906+ 1. For each line box of the box (outer loop), and then for each box, in
3907+ tree order, in that line box (inner loop):
3908+ or
3909+ 1. Taking each line box of the box in order, for each box (in tree order)
3910+ in that line box:
3911+ or
3912+ ???
39143913
39153914Resolution:
39163915
39173916=WG= Discuss.
39183917------------------------------------------------------------------------
39193918Issue 193.
39203919URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0049.html
3921- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0157.html
3920+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006JulSep/0157.html
39223921Description:
3923- Appendix E doesn't seem to address anonymous inlines.
3922+ Appendix E doesn't seem to address anonymous inlines.
39243923Resolution:
39253924
39263925=Elika= Propose text
39273926------------------------------------------------------------------------
39283927Issue 194.
39293928URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0054.html
39303929Description:
3931- Clarifications to inheritance, cascading, and initial values.
3930+ Clarifications to inheritance, cascading, and initial values.
39323931Resolution:
39333932
39343933=WG= Discuss.
39353934------------------------------------------------------------------------
39363935Issue 195.
39373936URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0202.html
39383937Description:
3939- Grammar/Tokenization errors
3938+ Grammar/Tokenization errors
39403939Resolution:
3941- No Change
3940+ No Change
39423941=Bert= Reply
39433942------------------------------------------------------------------------
39443943Issue 196.
39453944URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0019.html
39463945Description:
3947- http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CSS21-20060411/ui.html#propdef-outline-width
3948- says for the computed value of 'outline-width': "'0' if the
3949- outline style is 'none' or 'hidden'". But further down it says
3950- that 'hidden' is not a legal value for 'outline-style'.
3946+ http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CSS21-20060411/ui.html#propdef-outline-width
3947+ says for the computed value of 'outline-width': "'0' if the
3948+ outline style is 'none' or 'hidden'". But further down it says
3949+ that 'hidden' is not a legal value for 'outline-style'.
39513950Proposal:
3952- Remove "or 'hidden'" from the computed-value line.
3951+ Remove "or 'hidden'" from the computed-value line.
39533952=WG= Discuss.
0 commit comments