11<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN'>
22<html lang="en">
3- <!-- $Id: selector.src,v 2.51 1998-05-06 02:25:10 ijacobs Exp $ -->
3+ <!-- $Id: selector.src,v 2.52 1998-05-07 18:05:36 ijacobs Exp $ -->
44<head>
55<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
66<title>Selectors</title>
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ than <samp>[ID=p123]</samp> in terms of the <a
593593href="cascade.html">cascade</a>.
594594
595595<div class="note">
596- <p><em><strong>Note: </strong> In XML, the information about which
596+ <p><em><strong>Note. </strong> In XML 1.0 [[-XML10]] , the information about which
597597attribute contains an element's IDs is contained in a DTD. When
598598parsing XML, UAs do not always read the DTD, and thus may not know
599599what the ID of an element is. If a style sheet designer knows or
@@ -602,8 +602,8 @@ selectors instead: <code>[name=p371]</code> instead of
602602<code>#p371</code>. However, the cascading order of normal attribute
603603selectors is different from ID selectors. It may be necessary to add
604604an "!important" priority to the declarations: <code>[name=p371]
605- {color: red ! important}</code>. Of course, elements in XML documents
606- without a DTD do not have IDs at all.</em>
605+ {color: red ! important}</code>. Of course, elements in
606+ XML 1.0 documents without a DTD do not have IDs at all.</em>
607607</div>
608608
609609<h2><a name="pseudo-elements">Pseudo-elements</a> and <a
@@ -763,8 +763,8 @@ time, user agents may choose to return a visited link to the
763763<P>The two states are mutually exclusive.
764764
765765<p>The document language determines which elements are hyperlink
766- source anchors. For example, In HTML 4.0, the link pseudo-classes
767- only apply to A elements with an "href" attribute. Thus, the following
766+ source anchors. For example, in HTML 4.0, the link pseudo-classes
767+ apply to A elements with an "href" attribute. Thus, the following
768768two CSS2 declarations are equivalent:</p>
769769
770770<pre>
0 commit comments