You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@@ -182,8 +182,13 @@ body { font-family: "New Century Schoolbook", serif }
182
182
<p>If quoting is omitted, any white space characters before and after
183
183
the font name are ignored and any sequence of white space characters
184
184
inside the font name is converted to a single space.
185
-
186
-
Font family <em>names</em> that happen to be the same as a keyword value (e.g., 'initial', 'inherit', 'default', 'serif', 'sans-serif', 'monospace', 'fantasy', and 'cursive') must be quoted to prevent confusion with the keywords with the same names. UAs must not consider these keywords as matching the '<family-name>' type.
185
+
Font family <em>names</em> that happen to be the same as a keyword
186
+
value ('inherit', 'serif', 'sans-serif', 'monospace', 'fantasy', and
187
+
'cursive') must be quoted to prevent confusion with the keywords with
188
+
the same names. The keywords 'initial' and 'default' are reserved for
189
+
future use and must also be quoted when used as font names. UAs must
190
+
not consider these keywords as matching the '<family-name>'
191
+
type.
187
192
</p>
188
193
189
194
@@ -228,8 +233,8 @@ Garamond, Minion Web, ITC Stone Serif, MS Georgia, Bitstream Cyberbit
Monotype Albion 70, Bitstream Cyberbit, ER Bukinist
233
238
<tr><td>Hebrew fonts
234
239
<td>New Peninim, Raanana, Bitstream Cyberbit
235
240
<tr><td>Japanese fonts
@@ -591,8 +596,6 @@ sizes computed and kept by the UA. Possible values are:
591
596
</tr>
592
597
</table>
593
598
594
-
<p class="note">Note: implementation experience has demonstrated that a fixed ratio between adjacent absolute-size keywords is problematic, and this specification does NOT recommend such a fixed ratio, in contrast to previous specifications (<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1#font-size">CSS1 suggested 1.5</a>, and <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#font-size-props">CSS2 suggested 1.2</a>).</p>
595
-
596
599
<p>Implementors should build a table of scaling factors for absolute-size keywords relative to the 'medium' font size and the particular device and its characteristics (e.g., the resolution of the device).
597
600
</p>
598
601
@@ -609,10 +612,12 @@ these guidelines should nevertheless avoid creating font-size resulting
609
612
610
613
<p class="note"><em><strong>Note 2.</strong> In CSS1, the suggested
611
614
scaling factor between adjacent indexes was 1.5, which user experience
612
-
proved to be too large. In CSS2, the suggested scaling factor for a computer
613
-
screen between adjacent indexes was 1.2, which still created issues for the small
614
-
sizes. The new scaling factor varies between each index to provide better
615
-
readability.</em></p>
615
+
proved to be too large. In CSS2, the suggested scaling factor for a
616
+
computer screen between adjacent indexes was 1.2, which still created
617
+
issues for the small sizes. Implementation experience has demonstrated
618
+
that a fixed ratio between adjacent absolute-size keywords is
619
+
problematic, and this specification does <em>not</em> recommend such a
0 commit comments