[css2] Issue 144

bert-github · bert-github · commit 7f0ef87413a1 · 2010-10-05T19:25:20.000Z
from http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1 --HG-- extra : convert_revision : svn%3A73dc7c4b-06e6-40f3-b4f7-9ed1dbc14bfc/trunk%403041
diff --git a/css2/text.src b/css2/text.src
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
 <html lang="en">
-<!-- $Id: text.src,v 2.74 2010-08-25 23:13:03 bbos Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Id: text.src,v 2.75 2010-10-05 19:25:20 bbos Exp $ -->
 <head>
 <title>Text</title>
 <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css">
@@ -168,6 +168,23 @@ Underlines, overlines, and line-throughs are applied only to text
 borders, and padding are skipped.
 User agents must not render these text decorations on content that is
 not text. For example, images and inline blocks must not be underlined.
+
+<div class=note>
+<p><em><strong>Note.</strong> If an element E has both 'visibility:
+hidden' and 'text-decoration: underline', the underline is invisible
+(although any decoration of E's parent <strong>is</strong> visible.) 
+However, CSS&nbsp;2.1 does not specify if the underline is visible or
+invisible in E's children:</em>
+<pre class=html-example>
+&lt;span style="visibility: hidden; text-decoration: underline"&gt;
+ &lt;span style="visibility: visible"&gt;
+  underlined or not?
+ &lt;/span&gt;
+&lt;/span&gt;
+</pre>
+<p><em>This is expected to be specified in level&nbsp;3 of CSS.</em>
+</div>
+
 <p>
 The 'text-decoration' property on descendant elements cannot have any
 effect on the decoration of the ancestor. In determining the position
