Skip to content

Commit a3a9330

Browse files
fantasaifantasai
committed
[css3-flexbox] Update DoC]
1 parent 664c78a commit a3a9330

2 files changed

Lines changed: 188 additions & 4 deletions

File tree

‎css3-flexbox/issues-cr-2012.html‎

Lines changed: 179 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
1+
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
2+
<title>CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2012-09-19 CR</title>
3+
<style type="text/css">
4+
.a { background:lightgreen }
5+
.d { background: lightblue }
6+
.r { background:orange }
7+
.fo { background:red }
8+
.open { border: solid red; padding: 0.2em; }
9+
10+
:target {
11+
box-shadow: 0.25em 0.25em 0.25em;
12+
}
13+
</style>
14+
15+
<h1>CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2012-09-18 CR</h1>
16+
17+
<p>CR document: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-flexbox-20120918/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-flexbox-20120918/</a>
18+
19+
<p>Editor's draft: <a href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-values/</a>
20+
21+
<p>The following color coding convention is used for comments:</p>
22+
23+
<ul>
24+
<li class="a">Accepted or Rejected and positive response
25+
<li class="r">Rejected and no response
26+
<li class="fo">Rejected and negative response
27+
<li class="d">Deferred
28+
<li class="oi">Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
29+
</ul>
30+
31+
<p class=open>Open issues are marked like this</p>
32+
33+
<p>An issue can be closed as <code>Accepted</code>, <code>OutOfScope</code>,
34+
<code>Invalid</code>, <code>Rejected</code>, or <code>Retracted</code>.
35+
<code>Verified</code> indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.</p>
36+
37+
</pre>
38+
<pre class="a" id="issue-1">
39+
Issue 1.
40+
Summary: Handling of zero-length boxes at end of line
41+
From: Kang-Hao Lu
42+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html
43+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html
44+
Closed: Accepted
45+
</pre>
46+
<pre class="a" id="issue-2">
47+
Issue 2.
48+
Summary: Handling of negative-size flex lines
49+
From: Kang-Hao Lu
50+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html
51+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html
52+
Closed: Accepted
53+
</pre>
54+
<pre class="open" id="issue-3">
55+
Issue 3.
56+
Summary: Need way to fill flex-item boxes / Make 'stretch' propagate definiteness
57+
From: Rudolph Gottesheim
58+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0204.html
59+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0207.html
60+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0216.html
61+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0217.html
62+
Closed: Open? Closed?
63+
Alternative would be to reflow after stretching in order to resolve percentages
64+
inside the item (but treat them as auto for finding the flex item's size),
65+
then solve this with height: 100%.
66+
</pre>
67+
<pre class="d" id="issue-4">
68+
Issue 4.
69+
Summary: Constant spacing around items
70+
From: Giuseppe Bilotta
71+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0249.html
72+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0046.html
73+
Closed: Deferred (most cases possible; maybe add more spacing controls in next level)
74+
</pre>
75+
<pre class="open" id="issue-5">
76+
Issue 5.
77+
Summary: If percentage height cannot be resolved, is the flex items stretched?
78+
From: Ojan Vafai
79+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0220.html
80+
Response: NEED TO RESPOND, ALSO NEED CSS2.1 ERRATUM
81+
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15392
82+
Closed: Open
83+
</pre>
84+
<pre class="open" id="issue-6">
85+
Issue 6.
86+
Summary: Clarifications to abspos static position in flex containers
87+
From: Kang-Hao Lu
88+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0478.html
89+
Closed: Open
90+
</pre>
91+
<pre class="a" id="issue-7">
92+
Issue 7.
93+
Summary: Conflict in applicability of 'float' to flex items
94+
From: Daniel Holbert
95+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0675.html
96+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0698.html
97+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0691.html
98+
Closed: Accepted
99+
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0701.html
100+
</pre>
101+
<pre class="a" id="issue-8">
102+
Issue 8.
103+
Summary: Interaction of 'stretch' and items with aspect ratio
104+
From: Rossen Atanassov
105+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0781.html
106+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0040.html
107+
Closed: Accepted
108+
</pre>
109+
<pre class="a" id="issue-9">
110+
Issue 9.
111+
Summary: Transfer min/max constraints across dimensions via aspect ratio?
112+
From: Kang-Hao Lu
113+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0010.html
114+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0041.html
115+
Closed: Rejected
116+
</pre>
117+
<pre class="a" id="issue-10">
118+
Issue 10.
119+
Summary: Do flex items with negative margins increas available space?
120+
From: Tony Chang
121+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0460.html
122+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0462.html
123+
Closed: Rejected
124+
</pre>
125+
<pre class="a" id="issue-11">
126+
Issue 11.
127+
Summary: Stretch should clamp cross size to min/max before calculating flex base size
128+
From: Kang-Hao Lu
129+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0061.html
130+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0157.html
131+
Closed: Accepted
132+
</pre>
133+
<pre class="a" id="issue-12">
134+
Issue 12.
135+
Summary: Orthogonal Flex Layouts Sub-optimally Defined
136+
From: Rossen Atanassov
137+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0251.html
138+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0260.html
139+
Closed: Accepted
140+
</pre>
141+
<pre class="a" id="issue-13">
142+
Issue 13.
143+
Summary: Should ::first-line/::first-letter apply to a flex container?
144+
From: Tab Atkins
145+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0264.html
146+
Response:
147+
Closed: Accepted
148+
</pre>
149+
<pre class="oi" id="issue-14">
150+
Issue 14.
151+
Summary: Clarify interaction of min-width and width
152+
From: Ojan Vafai
153+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0046.html
154+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0050.html
155+
Closed: Invalid
156+
</pre>
157+
<pre class="a" id="issue-15">
158+
Issue 15.
159+
Summary: Should 'overflow' apply to flex containers?
160+
From: Daniel Holbert
161+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0465.html
162+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0001.html
163+
Closed: Accepted
164+
</pre>
165+
<pre class="open" id="issue-16">
166+
Issue 16.
167+
Summary: What should percentage margins on a flex item be relative to?
168+
From: fantasai
169+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0143.html
170+
Open
171+
</pre>
172+
<pre class="a" id="issue-17">
173+
Issue 17.
174+
Summary: Revert min-size of flex items to 0.
175+
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
176+
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0364.html
177+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0257.html
178+
Closed: Accepted
179+
</pre>

‎css3-flexbox/issues-cr-2012.txt‎

Lines changed: 9 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,22 +6,26 @@ Summary: Handling of zero-length boxes at end of line
66
From: Kang-Hao Lu
77
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html
88
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html
9-
Closed: Closed
9+
Closed: Accepted
1010
----
1111
Issue 2.
1212
Summary: Handling of negative-size flex lines
1313
From: Kang-Hao Lu
1414
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0094.html
1515
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0158.html
16-
Closed: Closed
16+
Closed: Accepted
1717
----
1818
Issue 3.
1919
Summary: Need way to fill flex-item boxes / Make 'stretch' propagate definiteness
2020
From: Rudolph Gottesheim
2121
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0204.html
2222
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0207.html
2323
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0216.html
24-
Closed: Open?
24+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0217.html
25+
Closed: Open? Closed?
26+
Alternative would be to reflow after stretching in order to resolve percentages
27+
inside the item (but treat them as auto for finding the flex item's size),
28+
then solve this with height: 100%.
2529
----
2630
Issue 4.
2731
Summary: Constant spacing around items
@@ -35,6 +39,7 @@ Summary: If percentage height cannot be resolved, is the flex items stretched?
3539
From: Ojan Vafai
3640
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0220.html
3741
Response: NEED TO RESPOND, ALSO NEED CSS2.1 ERRATUM
42+
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15392
3843
Closed: Open
3944
----
4045
Issue 6.
@@ -120,4 +125,4 @@ Summary: Revert min-size of flex items to 0.
120125
From: Tab Atkins Jr.
121126
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0364.html
122127
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0257.html
123-
Closed: Accepted
128+
Closed: Accepted

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)