Skip to content

Commit cfa1747

Browse files
author
John Daggett
committed
[css3-fonts] add disposition of comments for LCWD
1 parent c69ca26 commit cfa1747

1 file changed

Lines changed: 163 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

‎css-fonts/doc-20130711-LCWD.html‎

Lines changed: 163 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
1+
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
2+
<title>CSS Fonts Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-07-11 LCWD</title>
3+
<style type="text/css">
4+
.a { background:lightgreen }
5+
.d { background: lightblue }
6+
.r { background:orange }
7+
.fo { background:red }
8+
.open { border: solid red; padding: 0.2em; }
9+
10+
:target {
11+
box-shadow: 0.25em 0.25em 0.25em;
12+
}
13+
pre {
14+
white-space: pre-wrap;
15+
}
16+
</style>
17+
18+
<h1>CSS Fonts Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-07-11 LCWD</h1>
19+
20+
<p>Last call document: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-fonts-3-20130711/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-fonts-3-20130711/</a>
21+
22+
<p>Editor's draft: <a href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-fonts/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-fonts/</a>
23+
24+
<p>The following color coding convention is used for comments:</p>
25+
26+
<ul>
27+
<li class="a">Accepted or Rejected and positive response
28+
<li class="r">Rejected and no response
29+
<li class="fo">Rejected and negative response
30+
<li class="d">Deferred
31+
<li class="oi">Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
32+
</ul>
33+
34+
<p class=open>Open issues are marked like this</p>
35+
36+
<p>An issue can be closed as <code>Accepted</code>, <code>OutOfScope</code>,
37+
<code>Invalid</code>, <code>Rejected</code>, or <code>Retracted</code>.
38+
<code>Verified</code> indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.</p>
39+
40+
<pre class="open" id="issue-1">
41+
<a href="#issue-1">Issue 1</a>:
42+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0427.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0427.html</a>
43+
definition of same-origin restriction for font loading is contradictory
44+
Raised By: Anne van Kesteren
45+
Addressed by: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0428.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0428.html</a>
46+
No response from commenter.
47+
</pre>
48+
49+
<pre class="a" id="issue-2">
50+
<a href="#issue-2">Issue 2</a>:
51+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0686.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0686.html</a>
52+
letter-spacing, font-variant-ligatures and font feature precedence
53+
Raised By: fantasai
54+
Resolution: shift the relative precedence of features implied by other CSS properties to be higher than 'font-variant'
55+
Fixed in: <a href="https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/368c6ad02232">https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/368c6ad02232</a>
56+
Group response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0110.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0110.html</a>
57+
</pre>
58+
59+
<!--
60+
<pre class="r" id="issue-3">
61+
<a href="#issue-3">Issue 3</a>:
62+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0070.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0070.html</a>
63+
What does @supports return when the OS prevents the support?
64+
Raised By: James Nurthen
65+
Resolution: user and system preferences do not affect what @supports returns; it's only about UA capabilities, and must be the same as declaration fallback. So add a clarification of this, but no substantive change. (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
66+
Fixed in: <a href="https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/6e5d9a1539bd">https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/6e5d9a1539bd</a>
67+
Group response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0233.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0233.html</a>
68+
</pre>
69+
70+
<pre class="r" id="issue-4">
71+
<a href="#issue-4">Issue 4</a>:
72+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0436.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0436.html</a>
73+
@supports all
74+
Raised by: Nicholas Shanks
75+
Reply: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0442.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0442.html</a>
76+
Resolution: no change, per rationale in reply (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
77+
Group response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0234.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0234.html</a>
78+
</pre>
79+
80+
<pre class="a" id="issue-5">
81+
<a href="#issue-5">Issue 5</a>:
82+
Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to Issue 7b
83+
also raised as first issue in <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html</a>
84+
Raised by: David Baron, Florian Rivoal
85+
Proposed resolution: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0229.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0229.html</a>
86+
Florian agrees: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html</a>
87+
Edited: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0256.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0256.html</a>
88+
(Commenter agrees, of course.)
89+
</pre>
90+
91+
<pre class="a" id="issue-6">
92+
<a href="#issue-6">Issue 6</a> (prior to LC publication):
93+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0014.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0014.html</a>
94+
review of the new grammar for @supports
95+
Raised by: Florian Rivoal
96+
Addressed by: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html</a>
97+
Commenter agrees: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html</a>
98+
Resolution: Already fixed prior to LC; commenter agrees.
99+
</pre>
100+
101+
<pre class="a" id="issue-7a">
102+
<a href="#issue-7a">Issue 7a</a> (prior to LC publication):
103+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html</a>
104+
Each usage of CSSRuleList and MediaList should link to their definition.
105+
Raised by: Arthur Barstow
106+
Addressed by: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html</a>
107+
No response from commenter.
108+
</pre>
109+
110+
<pre class="a" id="issue-7b">
111+
<a href="#issue-7b">Issue 7b</a> (prior to LC publication):
112+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html</a>
113+
insertRule() should say what happens if index is already used
114+
Raised by: Arthur Barstow
115+
Addressed by: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html</a>
116+
No response from commenter.
117+
</pre>
118+
119+
<pre class="r" id="issue-7c">
120+
<a href="#issue-7c">Issue 7c</a> (prior to LC publication):
121+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html</a>
122+
not clear why there is a definition of conditionText in this section
123+
Raised by: Arthur Barstow
124+
Reason explained in: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html</a>
125+
No response from commenter.
126+
</pre>
127+
128+
<pre class="a" id="issue-7d">
129+
<a href="#issue-7d">Issue 7d</a> (prior to LC publication):
130+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html</a>
131+
for the second definition of supports(), there is a mismatch between the "declaration" argument and the use of "conditionText" in the text below.
132+
Raised by: Arthur Barstow
133+
Addressed by: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html</a>
134+
No response from commenter.
135+
</pre>
136+
137+
<pre class="a" id="issue-8">
138+
<a href="#issue-8">Issue 8</a>:
139+
second issue in <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html</a>
140+
serialization of supports_rule (forgot to edit in previous resolution)
141+
Raised By: Florian Rivoal
142+
Resolution: third resolution in <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0749.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0749.html</a>
143+
Fixed in <a href="https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/7dace721dff3">https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/7dace721dff3</a>
144+
Reply: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0235.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0235.html</a>
145+
Additional clarification requested in: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0237.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0237.html</a>
146+
Additional clarification added in: <a href="https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/37491845e530">https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/37491845e530</a>
147+
Additional reply: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0238.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0238.html</a>
148+
Commenter agrees: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0244.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0244.html</a>
149+
</pre>
150+
151+
<pre class="a" id="issue-9">
152+
<a href="#issue-9">Issue 9</a>:
153+
<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0236.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0236.html</a>
154+
confusing to have OR in one place and AND and NOT in another
155+
Raised by: Björn Höhrmann
156+
Resolution: Assumed editorial
157+
Fixed in <a href="https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/139db90ee7b2">https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/139db90ee7b2</a>
158+
Reply: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0239.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0239.html</a>
159+
Commenter agrees: <a href="http://www.w3.org/mid/0ln8h81t117a49bc0queqm89o2fo4g65n7@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de">http://www.w3.org/mid/0ln8h81t117a49bc0queqm89o2fo4g65n7@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de</a>
160+
</pre>
161+
-->
162+
163+
</body></html>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)