Skip to content

Commit d89ea47

Browse files
committed
Updated open issues. Still a few edits & actions to do before
submitting the transition request to the Director, but no more WG discussion required.
1 parent abd5fd0 commit d89ea47

1 file changed

Lines changed: 14 additions & 3 deletions

File tree

css3-background/issues-lc-2012.txt

Lines changed: 14 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
11
Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-background-20120214/
22
Audience: WG
3+
#Audience: Director
34

45
Set Audience to Director for an HTML version without the Edit fields.
56

@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ Edit: Changed to “Otherwise, the center
7071
the border widths. However it is not defined what these
7172
transitions look like or what function maps from this
7273
ratio to a point on the curve.”
74+
Closed: Accepted
7375

7476
Issue: 8
7577
Summary: Insert “two corresponding” in the formula in 5.5
@@ -162,6 +164,7 @@ From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
162164
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0133.html
163165
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0606.html
164166
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0617.html
167+
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0032.html
165168
Edit: Proposal: Accept, all properties apply, except
166169
that the border properties
167170
that existed in CSS 2.1 and 'box-decoration-break' do not apply
@@ -171,6 +174,9 @@ Edit: 2nd Proposal: Accept proposal from Kenny:
171174
“All properties in Chapter 3 apply
172175
to ::first-line and ::first-letter. All properties in
173176
Chapter 4 apply to ::first-letter.”
177+
Edit: Bert/Elika to edit according to Proposal 2 in the last
178+
reply (Elika's message from April 2).
179+
Closed: Accepted
174180

175181
Issue: 19
176182
Summary: Background of page area
@@ -199,8 +205,8 @@ Edit: Added “(or doesn't apply)” after “cannot be displayed”; and add
199205
the border image is drawn as described in the sections below.”
200206

201207
Issue: 22
202-
Summary: How exactly does border-image apply to table elements with
203-
collapsing borders (border conflict resolution)?
208+
Summary: Clarify how border-image applies to table elements with
209+
collapsing borders (relation to border conflict resolution)
204210
From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
205211
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
206212
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html
@@ -211,6 +217,11 @@ Edit: Proposal for the rest has two options:
211217
ink and then draw the image on top of it; or (B) an image border
212218
overrides any other border in the conflict resolution. (The
213219
difference is the calculation of the width of each cell.)
220+
Edit: Bert/Elika to edit to apply the WG decision:
221+
Make interaction of border-image with collapsed tables
222+
undefined, recommend not applying it to such tables in L3,
223+
expect it to be defined in L4.
224+
Closed: Accepted
214225

215226
Issue 23
216227
Summary: Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables
@@ -232,7 +243,7 @@ Edit: Edited
232243

233244
Issue 25
234245
Summary: Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers.
235-
Tab says (1st response) it's no longer needed, because you
246+
Edit: Tab says (1st response) it's no longer needed, because you
236247
can soon use 'image(red)' anywhere a URL is allowed, and (2nd
237248
response) that it would throw off the layer counting for the
238249
'background-color' property.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)