11Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-background-20120214/
22Audience: WG
3+ #Audience: Director
34
45Set Audience to Director for an HTML version without the Edit fields.
56
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ Edit: Changed to “Otherwise, the center
7071 the border widths. However it is not defined what these
7172 transitions look like or what function maps from this
7273 ratio to a point on the curve.”
74+ Closed: Accepted
7375
7476Issue: 8
7577Summary: Insert “two corresponding” in the formula in 5.5
@@ -162,6 +164,7 @@ From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
162164Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0133.html
163165Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0606.html
164166Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0617.html
167+ Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0032.html
165168Edit: Proposal: Accept, all properties apply, except
166169 that the border properties
167170 that existed in CSS 2.1 and 'box-decoration-break' do not apply
@@ -171,6 +174,9 @@ Edit: 2nd Proposal: Accept proposal from Kenny:
171174 “All properties in Chapter 3 apply
172175 to ::first-line and ::first-letter. All properties in
173176 Chapter 4 apply to ::first-letter.”
177+ Edit: Bert/Elika to edit according to Proposal 2 in the last
178+ reply (Elika's message from April 2).
179+ Closed: Accepted
174180
175181Issue: 19
176182Summary: Background of page area
@@ -199,8 +205,8 @@ Edit: Added “(or doesn't apply)” after “cannot be displayed”; and add
199205 the border image is drawn as described in the sections below.”
200206
201207Issue: 22
202- Summary: How exactly does border-image apply to table elements with
203- collapsing borders (border conflict resolution)?
208+ Summary: Clarify how border-image applies to table elements with
209+ collapsing borders (relation to border conflict resolution)
204210From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
205211Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
206212Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html
@@ -211,6 +217,11 @@ Edit: Proposal for the rest has two options:
211217 ink and then draw the image on top of it; or (B) an image border
212218 overrides any other border in the conflict resolution. (The
213219 difference is the calculation of the width of each cell.)
220+ Edit: Bert/Elika to edit to apply the WG decision:
221+ Make interaction of border-image with collapsed tables
222+ undefined, recommend not applying it to such tables in L3,
223+ expect it to be defined in L4.
224+ Closed: Accepted
214225
215226Issue 23
216227Summary: Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables
@@ -232,7 +243,7 @@ Edit: Edited
232243
233244Issue 25
234245Summary: Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers.
235- Tab says (1st response) it's no longer needed, because you
246+ Edit: Tab says (1st response) it's no longer needed, because you
236247 can soon use 'image(red)' anywhere a URL is allowed, and (2nd
237248 response) that it would throw off the layer counting for the
238249 'background-color' property.
0 commit comments