@@ -465,20 +465,20 @@ Proposal:
465465
466466 1. Use 300px by 150px. This will help us exit CR, because it's what
467467 implementations do today. It is not what CDF agreed to, and it's
468- not what SVG wants.
468+ not what CDF or SVG wants.
469469
470470 Text: current text
471471
472472 2. Use available width and intrinsic ratio where possible (fall back
473473 to 300px otherwise). This is not what implementations do today.
474- It is what SVG wants, and it is the most useful for authoring.
474+ It is what SVG wants, what CDF expected the spec to say, and it
475+ is the most useful for authoring.
475476
476477 Text: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2006OctDec/0373.html
477478 (+ changes for #3 to handle fallback)
478479
479- 3. Use 300px times intrinsic ratio. This respects the original proposal
480- agreed to with CDF. This is not what implementations do today, and
481- it's not what SVG wants.
480+ 3. Use 300px times intrinsic ratio. This is not what implementations
481+ do today, and it's not what CDF or SVG wants.
482482
483483 Text: Remove "'width' has some other computed value," from the 3rd
484484 paragraph in 10.6.2.
@@ -533,3 +533,25 @@ Description:
533533Resolution:
534534
535535=WG= Discuss.
536+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
537+ Issue 27.
538+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Mar/0004.html
539+ Description:
540+
541+ Spec is not clear on whether 'clip'-ed content that would have overflowed
542+ should be considered as causing overflow.
543+
544+ Resolution:
545+
546+ =WG= Discuss.
547+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
548+ Issue 28.
549+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2007JanMar/att-0376/MarginCollapsingSamples070302.htm
550+ Description:
551+
552+ Margin collapsing.
553+
554+ Resolution:
555+
556+ =WG= Discuss.
557+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 commit comments