@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Description:
88 Remove "(also called a declaration block in the following text)" completely.
99
1010Resolution:
11+
1112 Assumed editorial.
1213
1314=Bert= Edit.
@@ -34,10 +35,12 @@ Resolution:
3435=WG= Discuss.
3536------------------------------------------------------------------------
3637Issue 4.
37- URI: fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/specs/css2.1/min-max-replaced-2
38+ URI: http:// fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/specs/css2.1/min-max-replaced-2
3839URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Nov/0034.html
3940Description:
41+
4042 The Min-Max Issue
43+
4144Resolution:
4245
4346=www-style= Send comments.
@@ -46,9 +49,118 @@ Issue 5.
4649URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Nov/0049.html
4750URI: http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS2.1/current/t1202-counters-17-d.htm
4851Description:
52+
4953 Test assumes
5054 :before, :after { white-space: pre-line }
5155 is not there, even though it's in the sample style sheet.
56+
5257Resolution:
58+
5359 Repeat "white-space: pre" on :before, :after in test t1202-counters-17-d.htm
60+
5461=Ian= Edit.
62+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
63+ Issue 6.
64+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
65+ Description:
66+
67+ issues-3.103: Add reference to Unicode Standard, not just ISO10646.
68+
69+ Resolution:
70+
71+ =WG= Discuss.
72+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
73+ Issue 7.
74+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
75+ Description:
76+
77+ issues-3.104: Clarify that CSS reserving all property values and
78+ @keywords does not retroactively make invalid SVG 1.0/1.1 documents
79+ with external stylesheets.
80+
81+ Resolution:
82+
83+ =WG= Discuss.
84+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
85+ Issue 8.
86+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
87+ Description:
88+
89+ issues-3.105: RGB colors may be clipped prematurely.
90+
91+ Resolution:
92+
93+ =WG= Discuss.
94+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
95+ Issue 9.
96+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0021.html
97+ Description:
98+
99+ issues-3.106: Make all references to CSS3 obviously non-normative.
100+
101+ Resolution:
102+
103+ =WG= Discuss.
104+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
105+ Issue 10.
106+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0038.html
107+ Description:
108+
109+ Poster has a question about floats in absolutely-positioned elements,
110+ apparently can't find answer in spec. If we can't find it either, this
111+ is an issue. Otherwise, we just need to post a reply with the answer
112+ and add his test cases to the test suite.
113+
114+ Resolution:
115+
116+ =WG= Discuss.
117+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
118+ Issue 11.
119+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0057.html
120+ Description:
121+
122+ Empty inline elements should act like display: none; (?)
123+
124+ Resolution:
125+
126+ =WG= Discuss.
127+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
128+ Issue 12.
129+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Dec/0086.html
130+ Description:
131+
132+ Dissent on change to ignoring broken URIs in 'content'.
133+
134+ Resolution:
135+
136+ =WG= Discuss.------------------------------------------------------------------------
137+ Issue 13.
138+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Jan/0001.html
139+ Description:
140+
141+ Definition of replaced element unclear about embedded <svg> elements,
142+ uses undefined term "CSS formatter".
143+
144+ Resolution:
145+
146+ =WG= Discuss.
147+
148+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
149+ Issue 14.
150+ URI: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2006OctDec/0183.html
151+ Description:
152+
153+ The third bullet in Section 3.2 says that UA's that render must respect
154+ points 1-5. Should this be point 1-6?
155+
156+ Resolution:
157+
158+ =WG= Discuss.
159+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
160+ Issue 15.
161+ URI:
162+ Description:
163+
164+ Resolution:
165+
166+ =WG= Discuss.
0 commit comments