[css-grid-1] Update DoC

Author: fantasai

css-grid-1/issues-cr-2016.bsi

@@ -91,17 +91,17 @@ From:     fantasai
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/767
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/767#issuecomment-268107107
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0076.html
 Verified: Reporter is editor
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0076.html
 ----
 Issue 12.
 Summary:  Further concerns about automatic min size
 From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/283#issuecomment-262481269
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/283#issuecomment-268125974
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0061.html
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/283#issuecomment-271529375
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0061.html
 ----
 Issue 13.
 Summary:  Clarifications to baseline alignment
@@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ From:     Javier Fernandez
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/638
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/638#issuecomment-262734994
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: Editorial
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/638#issuecomment-271812141
+Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 15.
 Summary:  Percentages and intrinsic size
@@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ Summary:  Need more examples
 From:     Rachel Andrew
 Comment:  Various, including PRs
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: Editorial
 Verified: Commenter sent edits. :)
+Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 21.
 Summary:  Stretch vs. start is replaced elements or boxes with aspect ratio?
@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1140
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1140#issuecomment-290445963
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1140#issuecomment-290501314
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: Editor discretion
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1140#issuecomment-290529088
+Resolved: Editor discretion
 ----
 Issue 30.
 Summary:  Increase limit of rows/cols to make a px-grid for masonry layout
@@ -248,17 +248,17 @@ From:     Daniel Glazman
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1137
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1137#issuecomment-290156131
 Closed:   Rejected
-Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0018.html
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1137#issuecomment-291411266
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0018.html
 ----
 Issue 32.
 Summary:  Computed value for single value <flex>?
 From:     Mats Palmgren
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/529
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/529#issuecomment-251841937
 Closed:   Invalid
-Resolved: Editor discretion
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/529#issuecomment-251849386
+Resolved: Editor discretion
 ----
 Issue 33.
 Summary:  Additional clarifications to baseline alignment participation
@@ -270,8 +270,8 @@ Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/425#issuecomment-263045691
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/425#issuecomment-271811362
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/425#issuecomment-277090431
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: Editorial
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/425#issuecomment-277217390
+Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 34.
 Summary:  Stray reference to block-axis baseline
@@ -285,8 +285,8 @@ Summary:  Gutter math is broken
 From:     Cory Simmons
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/563
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/563#issuecomment-251263953
-Closed:   Retracted
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/563#issuecomment-251495803
+Closed:   Retracted
 ----
 Issue 36.
 Summary:  Placing Against Missing Line Names Needs Example
@@ -303,16 +303,16 @@ Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1039
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1039#issuecomment-337327396
 Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/36224722dc40432700709d1267b552b738ee3b49
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Nov/0017.html
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1039#issuecomment-340453492
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Nov/0017.html
 ----
 Issue 38.
 Summary:  Harmonize intrinsic sizing w/ aspect ratio
 From:     François Remy
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112#issuecomment-321915494
-Closed:   Retracted
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112#issuecomment-322848926
+Closed:   Retracted
 ----
 Issue 39.
 Summary:  Auto min size should not min against content size
@@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1117#issuecomment-290551887
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1149
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1149#issuecomment-321366399
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0002.html
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1149#issuecomment-328014987
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0002.html
 ----
 Issue 40.
 Summary:  Stretching tracks fails to feed back into sizing algo
@@ -333,35 +333,34 @@ Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1117#issuecomment-290551887
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1150
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1150#issuecomment-319426378
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0002.html
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1150#issuecomment-328123508
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0002.html
 ----
 Issue 41.
 Summary:  Mixup in what free space means
 From:     Rossen Atanassov
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1120
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1120#issuecomment-336548802
-Open:     Accepted, pending verification
+Closed:   Accepted
 Resolved: Editor discretion
-Verified: =Rossen= Review
 ----
 Issue 42.
 Summary:  Share gap properties across layout modes
 From:     fantasai
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1696
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1696#issuecomment-321367253
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0002.html
 Verified: Reporter is editor
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0002.html
 ----
 Issue 43.
 Summary:  Auto track expansion forgets to handle min-sizes
 From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1866
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1866#issuecomment-336537672
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: Bugfix
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1866#issuecomment-336848317
+Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
 Issue 44.
 Summary:  Synchronize text defining grid areas
@@ -377,8 +376,8 @@ From:     Philip Helger
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1166
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1166#issuecomment-292851029
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: Editorial
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1166#issuecomment-292120075
+Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 46.
 Summary:  2.4.1 Example Error
@@ -478,8 +477,8 @@ Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324#issuecomment-311176689
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324#issuecomment-337416416
 Closed:   Rejected
-Resolved: Editor discretion
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324#issuecomment-337576533
+Resolved: Editor discretion
 ----
 Issue 58.
 Summary:  Add magical wrapping-spanning behavior
@@ -488,17 +487,17 @@ Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1344#issue-227616928
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1344#issuecomment-300594222
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1344#issuecomment-315893247
 Closed:   Rejected
-Resolved: Editor discretion
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1344#issuecomment-300713652
+Resolved: Editor discretion
 ----
 Issue 59.
 Summary:  Add example of baseline alignment as needing 2nd pass
 From:     Manuel Rego
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1350
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1350#issuecomment-322570849
 Closed:   Invalid
-Resolved: Editorial
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1350
+Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 60.
 Summary:  Error in mapping implicit track sizes
@@ -515,6 +514,7 @@ Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1365
 Proposal: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1365#issuecomment-337333901
 Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1874f83e49d55dc18e4d8759a09a0c0c45288b76
 Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1365#issuecomment-348623006
 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Nov/0017.html
 ----
 Issue 62.
@@ -553,8 +553,8 @@ From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas and Rachel Andrew
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1732
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1732#issuecomment-330915960
 Closed:   Accepted
-Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0045.html
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1732#issuecomment-331178610
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0045.html
 ----
 Issue 67.
 Summary:  Grid Container Sizing incorrectly handles floats vs in-flow
@@ -569,15 +569,16 @@ Summary:  Intrinsic sizing with ∑flex < 1 is broken
 From:     fantasai
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-332671797
-Closed:   Retracted
 Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-335298121
+Closed:   Retracted
 ----
 Issue 69.
 Summary:  Reconsider using zero as implied min track sizing for fr units
 From:     Sergio Villar
 Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1777
 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1777#issuecomment-337427701
 Closed:   Rejected
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1777#issuecomment-349230789
 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0025.html
 ----
 Issue 70.