Skip to content

Removing the "Free Cultural Works" Designation #87

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
kalendar opened this issue Jan 28, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Removing the "Free Cultural Works" Designation #87

kalendar opened this issue Jan 28, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
⛔️ status: discarded Will not be worked on

Comments

@kalendar
Copy link

Why are we dragging forward the Free Cultural Works designation in the license chooser?

Ostensibly, the chooser is used by novice users who need to be taken step by step through each of the considerations involved in choosing a CC license. Why confuse that already daunting process with this icon and link? The icon and link appear with no context in the "Your License" pane on the right. Providing the necessary context for them would only further complicate things for novice users. In teaching 1000s of people about Creative Commons over the years I have seen many people get confused when they encounter the FCW icon / link in the middle of the license chooser process.

We have a rare opportunity to remove a large source of confusion from the license selection process. I believe we should remove the icon and link.

@akmadian
Copy link
Member

Hello and thank you for bringing this to our attention. We will be discussing this in the next week or so and will get back to you about it soon!

@akmadian
Copy link
Member

akmadian commented Feb 3, 2020

Hey @kalendar, the discussion about this is currently ongoing. There is currently no deadline for a decision, but one will be made either way before the new chooser is released. Please feel free to ping me if you've got any questions :)

@cbrennanpoole
Copy link

I am a year new to the digital creative community; and not that it counts for much, but, I rather like the Free Cultural Works Designation as it does have a purpose; psychological but there is purpose.

As for me, it was the first thing that stood out with the CC BY 4.0 making me curious to learn more while now checking footers on websites to see how they share.

Also, great job with the license chooser; would love to someday become proficient enough to help develop an extension, as the most arduous part of using the licensing is the shuffling around trying to make sure you have the license linked properly and tagged. That and the wording; as simple as it is; it's daunting when you're all new and trying learn all things 2020 digital skills.

This will definitely make for an amazing extension, certainly you all are already considering this. Thanks CC community for all the good things you are doing.

Best,

C-Brennan-Poole
Chasing the Wind

@akmadian akmadian added the meta label Mar 5, 2020
@akmadian
Copy link
Member

akmadian commented Mar 5, 2020

Hello all! We've decided to go for a middle ground and still include the opportunity to learn about free culture licenses and free cultural works through the help section. This can be found on the right side of the site, under the "Confused? Need Help?" section, through clicking on "What is a Free Culture License?".

We think that this approach, while still providing the ability to learn more, and even adding more information about FCW, reduces clutter and keeps the license selection process simple and easy.

I'm going to close this issue, but I'll be notified of any new posts in the this thread in case you have any questions :)

@fkohrt
Copy link
Contributor

fkohrt commented Aug 30, 2024

I find it very unfortunate that by now you have opted to completely remove the "Free Cultural Works" designation, not only from the sidebar but also from the help section (#441, #443, 117d4c2). I had hoped a more balanced approach would be taken when weighing simplicity against teaching about the public commons. The NC and ND restrictions do make a difference and we have come a long way to make this recognition.

I don't really see how the mere statement "this is a good/recommended/free license" considerably increases the mental load. And to me as a educator, it feels like there's some change in direction and I'm loosing my backup. Whereas previously I could point to CC and say "look, they also recommend this", CC does not differentiate them, although (1) "clear marking of qualifying CC licenses as free [was] one of the issues to be addressed for a potential migration of Wikipedia to CC Attribution-ShareAlike" (mike, 2008) and (2) the 4.0 discussions around these concerns concluded with the following:

CC will be improving messaging and information around the use and meaning of NC, including making greater distinction between the openness of the licenses with and without the NC and ND conditions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⛔️ status: discarded Will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants