MIT license update

According to what I understand from the MIT license, the name of the
original author in the copyright seems to be the only obligation to
respect it correctly.

I’m also possibly waiting for a response here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26033524/licensing-under-mit-a-librar
y-ive-rewritten-and-renamed-thats-already-under

poke @necolas: Is this ok for you this way ?

Author: MoOx

LICENSE

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 The MIT License (MIT)
 
-Copyright (c) 2014 "MoOx" Maxime Thirouin
+Copyright (c) 2014, Maxime Thirouin & Nicolas Gallagher
 
 Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of
 this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in