forked from w3c/csswg-drafts
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathissues-2018-11-cr.html
78 lines (71 loc) · 3.19 KB
/
issues-2018-11-cr.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
<!DOCTYPE html>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2018-11-08 CR</title>
<style>
.a { background: lightgreen }
.d { background: lightblue }
.r { background: orange }
.fo { background: red }
.open { border: solid red; padding: 0.2em; }
:target { box-shadow: 0.25em 0.25em 0.25em; }
</style>
<h1>CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2018-11-08 CR</h1>
<p>Review document: <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-contain-1-20181108/">https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-contain-1-20181108/</a>
<p>Editor's draft: <a href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/</a>
<p>The following color coding convention is used for comments:</p>
<ul>
<li class="a">Accepted or Rejected and positive response
<li class="r">Rejected and no response
<li class="fo">Rejected and negative response
<li class="d">Deferred
<li class="oi">Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
</ul>
<p class=open>Open issues are marked like this</p>
<p>An issue can be closed as <code>Accepted</code>, <code>OutOfScope</code>,
<code>Invalid</code>, <code>Rejected</code>, or <code>Retracted</code>.
<code>Verified</code> indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.</p>
<pre class='a' id='issue-1'>
Issue 1. <a href='#issue-1'>#</a>
Summary: Style containment is difficult to implement, and should not hold up the rest
From: Emilio
Comment: <a href='https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3280'>https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3280</a>
Closed: Accepted
Resolved: <a href='https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3280#issuecomment-467588765'>https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3280#issuecomment-467588765</a></pre>
<pre class='oi' id='issue-2'>
Issue 2. <a href='#issue-2'>#</a>
Summary: Spec makes incorrect claims about outside-in isolation
From: Christian Biesinger
Comment: <a href='https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3357'>https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3357</a>
Closed: Invalid
Resolved: Editors' discretion</pre>
<script>
(function () {
var sheet = document.styleSheets[0];
function addCheckbox(className) {
var element = document.querySelector('*.' + className);
var label = document.createElement('label');
label.innerHTML = element.innerHTML;
element.innerHTML = null;
var check = document.createElement('input');
check.type = 'checkbox';
if (className == 'open') {
check.checked = false;
sheet.insertRule('pre:not(.open)' + '{}', sheet.cssRules.length);
check.onchange = function (e) {
rule.style.display = this.checked ? 'none' : 'block';
}
}
else {
check.checked = true;
sheet.insertRule('pre.' + className + '{}', sheet.cssRules.length);
check.onchange = function (e) {
rule.style.display = this.checked ? 'block' : 'none';
}
}
var rule = sheet.cssRules[sheet.cssRules.length - 1];
element.appendChild(label);
label.insertBefore(check, label.firstChild);
}
['a', 'd', 'fo', 'oi', 'r', 'open'].forEach(addCheckbox);
}());
</script>