2
2
Title : CSS Snapshot 2020
3
3
Shortname : css-2020
4
4
Level : none
5
- Status : ED
5
+ Status : WG-NOTE
6
6
Group : CSSWG
7
+ Date : 2020-12-21
8
+ Prepare for TR : yes
7
9
Work Status : revising
8
10
URL : https://drafts.csswg.org/css-2020/
9
- TR : https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/
11
+ TR : https://www.w3.org/TR/css-2020/
12
+ Previous Version : https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/NOTE-css-2018-20190122/
10
13
Editor : Tab Atkins Jr., Google, http://xanthir.com/, w3cid 42199
11
14
Editor : Elika J. Etemad / fantasai, Invited Expert, http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact, w3cid 35400
12
15
Editor : Florian Rivoal, Invited Expert, https://florian.rivoal.net, w3cid 43241
@@ -24,15 +27,15 @@ spec:selectors-4; type:selector; text::lang()
24
27
</pre>
25
28
26
29
<div boilerplate=status>
27
- This document is a work in progress,
30
+ <!-- This document is a work in progress,
28
31
aimed at representing the state of CSS as of 2020.
29
- It should become a Working Group Note when completed.
32
+ It should become a Working Group Note when completed. -->
30
33
31
- <!-- Replace the above with this when publishing to TR:
34
+ <!-- Replace the above with this when publishing to TR: -->
32
35
This document represents the state of CSS as of 2020.
33
36
The CSS Working Group does not expect any further changes to this document:
34
37
new snapshots will be published at <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/">https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/</a> as CSS advances.
35
- -->
38
+
36
39
37
40
</div>
38
41
@@ -647,7 +650,7 @@ Market Pressure and De Facto Standards</h4>
647
650
to be used in production websites for a substantial number of use cases.
648
651
649
652
<p class="note"> Note that the CSSWG must still be consulted to ensure coordination across vendors
650
- and to ensure sanity review by the CSS experts from each vendor.
653
+ and to ensure coherency review by the CSS experts from each vendor.
651
654
Note also that <a>rough interoperability</a> still usually means
652
655
painful lack of interop in edge (or not-so-edge) cases,
653
656
particularly because details have not been ironed out through the standards review process.
0 commit comments