[css-multicol-1] Spell check.

Author: dbaron

css-multicol-1/Overview.bs

@@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ Spanning Columns</h2>
 			The element establishes an [=independent formatting context=].
 
 			Note: Whether the element establishes a new <a>formatting context</a>
-			does not depend on whether the element is a descendent of a multicol or not.
+			does not depend on whether the element is a descendant of a multicol or not.
 			When 'column-span' is ''column-span/all'', it always does.
 			This helps with robustness of designs to later revisions that remove the multicol,
 			or when media queries turn the multicol off in some situations.
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ Pagination and Overflow Outside Multicol Containers</h3>
 
 		In continuous contexts overflow columns can affect the height of the multicol container. 
 		In this example a column appears in the overflow which has four lines of text. 
-		The multicol container is made tall enough to accomodate this column.
+		The multicol container is made tall enough to accommodate this column.
 
 		<figure>
 			<img src="images/overflow-column-effects-height.svg" alt="Four columns, overflow column is taller than the first three">
@@ -1600,9 +1600,9 @@ This appendix is <em>informative</em>.
 	<li>Changed the value of normal for column-gap to be 1em, rather than a UA-specified length with a suggestion of 1em. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2145#issuecomment-378781507">Resolved: 4 Apr 2018</a></li>
 	<li>Clarified that negative values are not allowed for column-width, and that while 0 may be specified, used values will be clamped to a minimum of 1px. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1741#issuecomment-373091628">Resolved: 14 Mar 2018</a></li>
 	<li>Clarified that where there is a spanning element content is automatically balanced across all columns in the immediately preceding column row before the element appears. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1075">Resolved: 9 Nov 2017</a></li>
-	<li>Added clarification plus an additional example that spanning elements may be lower the the first level of descendents, and that in the case of margins, borders and padding on the element containing the spanning, this would be drawn above the spanner. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1072#issuecomment-342668025">Resolved: 8 Nov 2017</a></li>
+	<li>Added clarification plus an additional example that spanning elements may be lower the the first level of descendants, and that in the case of margins, borders and padding on the element containing the spanning, this would be drawn above the spanner. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1072#issuecomment-342668025">Resolved: 8 Nov 2017</a></li>
 	<li>Changed the sentence <q>Column rules are painted in the inline content layer, but below all inline content inside the multicol element.</q> to <q>Column rules are painted just above the border of the multicol element. For scrollable multicol elements, note that while the border and background of the multicol element obviously aren’t scrolled, the rules need to scroll along with the columns.</q> <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1739#issuecomment-342659978">Resolved: 7 Nov 2017</a></li>
-	<li>Under section The Multi-column Model, removed two sentences <q>That is, column boxes behave like block-level, table cell, and inline-block boxes as per CSS 2.1, section 10.1, item 2 CSS21. However, column boxes do not establish block container boxes for elements with ''position: fixed or position: absolute''.</q>. THese were replaced with a clarification about the principal box and a new example showing how abspos elements refer to the multicol container. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1738#issuecomment-342661881">Resolved: 7 Nov 2017</a></li>
+	<li>Under section The Multi-column Model, removed two sentences <q>That is, column boxes behave like block-level, table cell, and inline-block boxes as per CSS 2.1, section 10.1, item 2 CSS21. However, column boxes do not establish block container boxes for elements with ''position: fixed or position: absolute''.</q>. These were replaced with a clarification about the principal box and a new example showing how abspos elements refer to the multicol container. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1738#issuecomment-342661881">Resolved: 7 Nov 2017</a></li>
 	<li>Removed the sentence "To indicate where column breaks should (or should not) appear, new keyword values are introduced." and following example (Example 7 in the WD published <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-multicol-1-20171005/">5 Oct 2017</a>) as the multicol specification no longer introduces these properties. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1966">Editorial</a></li>
 	<li>Changed how we reference the element we have applied multicol to from multi-column or multicol <q>element</q> to multi-column or multicol <q>container</q>. <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1965">Resolved: 22 November 2017</a></li>
 	<li>Removed the example which stated "If a tall image is moved to a column on the next page to find room for it, its natural column may be left empty. If so, the column is still considered to have content for the purpose of deciding if the column rule should be drawn." <a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1740">Resolved: 7 September 2017</a></li>
@@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ This appendix is <em>informative</em>.
 	<li>Added keyword balance-all and examples to demonstrate how this should work. <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0471.html">Resolved: September 2013</a>.
 	<li> The pseudo-algorithm has been revised on a number of occasions. <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0471.html">Latest change Feb 2013</a>.
 	<li>Clarified that properties 'columns', 'column-width', 'column-count' "apply to block containers". <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0536.html">Ref: Feb 2013</a>.
-	<li>Breaking properties have beeen moved from this specification to the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/css-break-3/">CSS Fragmentation Module</a>.
+	<li>Breaking properties have been moved from this specification to the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/css-break-3/">CSS Fragmentation Module</a>.
 	<li>Change to 'column-fill' wording to clarify that 'column-fill' is honored before page breaks. <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0393.html">Ref: Jan 2012</a>.
 	<li>Amended example and text to clarify what happens with margin collapsing and spanning elements. <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Oct/0247.html">Ref: Oct 2013</a>.
 	<li>Clarification that 'column-rule-width' does not alter the size or placement of columns. <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0550.html">Ref: Sep 2013</a>.