[css-grid] Add DoC

Author: fantasai

css-grid/issues-wd-20150917.bsi

@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
+Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-grid-1-20150917/
+Title:    CSS Grid Layout Level 1
+
+----
+Issue 1.
+Summary:  Default alignment of grid tracks should match Flexbox
+From:     fantasai & Javier Fernandez
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0022.html
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0026.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0121.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: reporter is editor
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0031.html
+----
+Issue 2.
+Summary:  Confusion over implicit named areas
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0040.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0072.html
+Closed:   Invalid
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 3.
+Summary:  Abspos item placement in degenerate grids
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0088.html
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0098.html
+Response: 
+Open:     ???
+Verified: 
+Resolved: 
+----
+Issue 4.
+Summary:  Errors in overlarge clamping rule
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0033.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0068.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 5.
+Summary:  Missing start = end conflict handling rule
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0034.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0069.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 6.
+Summary:  Clarifying percentage resolution against indefinite sizing
+From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0046.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0074.html
+Closed:   OutOfScope
+Note:     Filed against CSS Sizing
+Verified: 
+Resolved: 
+----
+Issue 7.
+Summary:  Confusion over baseline content alignment and baseline self alignment
+From:     Javier Fernandez
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0122.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0075.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 8.
+Summary:  Clarify sizing under a min/max-content constraint
+From:     Sergio Villar Senin
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0190.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0194.html
+Closed:   Invalid
+Verified: 
+Resolved: 
+----
+Issue 9.
+Summary:  Clarify behavior of CSS-wide keywords and reset-only longhands
+From:     David Baron
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0255.html
+Response: 
+Open:     
+Verified: 
+Resolved: 
+----
+Issue 10.
+Summary:  Percentages resolving against max-height
+From:     Tab and fantasai
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0067.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0090.html
+Closed:   Invalid
+Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html
+----
+Issue 11.
+Summary:  Clarifications to repeat()
+From:     Mats Plamgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0033.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0037.html
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0041.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0043.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 12.
+Summary:  Axis ordering 2-value vs 4-value properties
+From:     Tab and fantasai
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0212.html
+Response: 
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: 
+----
+Issue 13.
+Summary:  Linking errors etc. for alignment properties
+From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0030.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0055.html
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0084.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0062.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 14.
+Summary:  Percentage resolution and intrinsic sizing
+From:     Sergio Villar Senin
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0295.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0066.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 15.
+Summary:  Example is confusing
+From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0110.html
+Response: 
+Open
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 15.
+Summary:  Clarification to 'fr'
+From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0323.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0131.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 16.
+Summary:  Error: wrong axis in definition
+From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0263.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0159.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 17.
+Summary:  Placement algo doesn't handle negative-index implicit lines
+From:     Menuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0088.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0160.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 18.
+Summary:  Errors in grid-gap propdef tables
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0028.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0072.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: 
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 19.
+Summary:  Grid gap suppression at fragmentation breaks
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0245.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0246.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: =WG= Approve, pls.
+----
+Issue 20.
+Summary:  ?????
+From:     Javier Fernandez
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0255.html
+Open
+----
+Issue 21.
+Summary:  Confusion about reset-only behavior of 'grid-gap' in 'grid' shorthand
+From:     Luke Stebbing
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0273.html
+----
+Issue 22.
+Summary:  Errors in definition of 'auto' minimum track sizes
+From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0086.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0158.html
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0288.html
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0032.html
+----
+Issue 23.
+Summary:  Tighten up definition of dropping empty tracks
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0034.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0155.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+----
+Issue 24.
+Summary:  Drop empty tracks at ends or also in the middle?
+From:     Mats Palmgren
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0027.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0034.html
+Open:     =WG= Discuss / find use cases.
+----
+Issue 25.
+Summary:  Subgrids considered essential
+From:     Eric Meyer
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0106.html
+Open:     ???
+----
+Issue 26.
+Summary:  Spanning to missing named lines: which side of the grid?
+From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0063.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0123.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: =WG= Discuss.
+----