Title: CSS Conditional Rules Module Level 4
Group: csswg
Shortname: css-conditional
Level: 4
Status: ED
!Delta Spec: yes
Work Status: Exploring
ED: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-4/
TR: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-conditional-4/
Previous Version: https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/WD-css-conditional-4-20200303/
Test Suite: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-conditional-4_dev/nightly-unstable/
Editor: L. David Baron, Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/, https://dbaron.org/, w3cid 15393
Editor: Elika J. Etemad / fantasai, Invited Expert, http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact, w3cid 35400
Editor: Chris Lilley, W3C, https://svgees.us/, w3cid 1438
Abstract: This module contains the features of CSS for conditional processing of parts of
  style sheets, conditioned on capabilities of the processor or the
  document the style sheet is being applied to.  It includes and extends the
  functionality of CSS lConditional 3 [[!css-conditional-3]].
  The main extensions compared to level 3 are
  the Generalized Conditional ''@when''
  and Chained Conditional ''@else'' rules, and
  the addition of selector and font tech queries to the the ''@supports'' rule.
Default Highlight: css

Introduction

This is currently an early draft of the things that are new in level 4. The features in level 3 are still defined in [[css-conditional-3]] and have not yet been copied here. It adds extensions to the ''@supports'' rule to allow testing for supported selectors and supported font technologies. It also adds an ''@when'' rule, which generalizes the concept of a conditional rule. Anything you can express in an existing conditional rule can be expressed in ''@when'', it just has to be wrapped in an appropriate function to declare what kind of condition it is. This allow authors to easily combine multiple types of queries, such as media queries and supports queries, in a single boolean expression. Without this, authors must rely on nesting separate conditional rules, which is harder to read and write, presupposes the conditions are to be conjoined with the "and" boolean relation (with no easy way to indicate anything else), and restricts their utility in the proposed conditional rule chains. It also adds ''@else'' rules, which immediately follow conditional rules and automatically qualify their conditions as you'd expect, such that at most one rule in an conditional rule chain is chosen as active. Issue: In the future, copy the contents of [[css-conditional-3]] into this document.

Extensions to the ''@supports'' rule

This level of the specification extends the <> syntax as follows:
	<supports-feature> = <> | <>
                    | <> | <>
	<supports-selector-fn> = selector( <> )
  <supports-font-tech-fn> = font-tech ( <> )
  <font-tech> = [ features-opentype | features-aat | features-graphite
                      | color-colrv0 | color-colrv1 | color-svg | color-sbix | color-cbdt
                      | variations | palettes | incremental ]
  <supports-font-format-fn> = font-format ( <> )
  <font-format = [ collection | embedded-opentype | opentype
                      | svg | truetype | woff | woff2 ]
: <> :: The result is true if the UA supports the selector provided as an argument to the function. : <> :: The result is true if the UA supports the font tech provided as an argument to the function. : <> :: The result is true if the UA supports the font format provided as an argument to the function.

Extensions to the definition of support

A CSS processor is considered to support a CSS selector if it accepts that selector (rather than discarding it as a parse error), and that selector doesn't contain unknown -webkit- pseudo-elements. A CSS processor is considered to support a font tech when the text and layout processing engine ingesting this CSS text is capable of utilising the specified [[css-fonts-4#font-tech-definitions]] in layout and rendering. Note: the allowed values for the font-tech function are the same as those for the tech function in the '@font-face' '@font-face/src' descriptor. A CSS processor is considered to support a font format when the text and layout processing engine ingesting this CSS text is capable of utilising the specified [[css-fonts-4#font-format-definitions]] in layout and rendering. Note: the allowed values for the font-format function are the same as those for the format function in the '@font-face' '@font-face/src' descriptor.

Generalized Conditional Rules: the ''@when'' rule

The @when at-rule is a conditional group rule that generalizes the individual conditional group rules such as ''@media'' and ''@supports''. It is defined as:
@when <> {
	<>
}
Where <> is a boolean algebra a la [[mediaqueries-4#mq-syntax]], but with ''media()'' and ''supports()'' functions as leaves. Issue: Define "boolean algebra, with X as leaves" in a generic way in Conditional, so all the conditional rules can reference it directly, rather than having to redefine boolean algebra on their own. The ''media()'' and ''supports()'' functions are defined as:
media() = media( [ <> | <> | <> ] )
supports() = supports( <> )
A ''media()'' or ''supports()'' function is associated the boolean result that its contained condition is associated with.

Chained Conditionals: the ''@else'' rule

Usually, conditional group rules are independent; each one has a separate condition evaluated without direct reference to any other rule, and decides whether or not to apply its contained rules based solely on its condition. This is fine for simple conditions, but makes it difficult to write a collection of conditionals that are meant to be mutually exclusive; authors have to very carefully craft their conditions to not activate when the other rules are meant to, and make sure the collection of conditionals don't accidentally all exclude some situation which is then left unstyled. The @else rule is a conditional group rule used to form conditional rule chains, which allow multiple conditional rules to be provided and guarantee that at most one of them will evaluate their condition as true. It is defined as:
@else <>? {
	<>
}
''@else'' is interpreted identically to ''@when''. If its <> is omitted, it's treated as having a condition that's always true. A conditional rule chain is a series of consecutive conditional group rules, starting with a conditional group rule other than ''@else'', followed by zero or more ''@else'' rules. There cannot be anything between the successive conditional group rules other than whitespace and/or comments; any other token "breaks" the chain. Issue: Should we require that only the last ''@else'' in a chain can have an omitted condition? It's not uncommon for me, when debugging code, to short-circuit an if-else chain by setting one of them to "true"; I presume that would be similarly useful in CSS? It's still pretty easy to see you've done something wrong if you omit the condition accidentally. Within a conditional rule chain, the conditions of each conditional group rule are evaluated in order. If one of them is true, the conditions of all following conditional group rules in the chain must evaluate to false, regardless of what they contain. An ''@else'' rule that is not part of a conditional rule chain is invalid and must be ignored.
For example, here's a (somewhat silly) conditional chain:
		@when media(width >= 400px) and media(pointer: fine) and supports(display: flex) {
			/* A */
		} @else supports(caret-color: pink) and supports(background: double-rainbow()) {
			/* B */
		} @else {
			/* C */
		}
	
Exactly one of the preceding rules will be chosen, even though the second rule doesn't exclude large widths, fine points, or flexbox support, and the last rule doesn't specify anything at all. To achieve the same result without conditional rule chains, you'd need to write:
		@media (width >= 400px) and (pointer: fine) {
			@supports (display: flex) {
				/* A */
			}
			@supports not (display: flex) {
				@supports (caret-color: pink) and (background: double-rainbow()) {
					/* B */
				}
				@supports not ((caret-color: pink) and (background: double-rainbow())) {
					/* C */
				}
			}
		}
		@media not ((width >= 400px) and (pointer: fine)) {
			@supports (caret-color: pink) and (background: double-rainbow()) {
				/* B */
			}
			@supports not ((caret-color: pink) and (background: double-rainbow())) {
				/* C */
			}
		}
	
This is simultaneously impossible to read, requires significant duplication of both conditions and contents, and is very difficult to write correctly If the conditions got any more complicated (which is not unusual in real-world content), the example would get significantly worse.
In this example, three different color font technologies are tested, in order of preference, plus a monochrome fallback. The most capable, COLRv1, supports both gradients and font variations; the next best choice, SVG, supports gradients while the least capable, COLRv0, supports flat color fill only. The fallback has no test condition, so will always be chosen unless one of the earlier conditions succeeds.
  @when font-tech(color-COLRv1) and font-tech(variations) {
      @font-face { font-family: icons; src: url(icons-gradient-var.woff2); }
  }
  @else font-tech(color-SVG) {
      @font-face { font-family: icons; src: url(icons-gradient.woff2); }
  }
  @else font-tech(color-COLRv0) {
      @font-face { font-family: icons; src: url(icons-flat.woff2); }
  }
  @else {
      @font-face { font-family: icons; src: url(icons-fallback.woff2); }
  }
  
Notice that in this example, the variable color font is only downloaded if COLRv1 is supported and font variations are also supported. Notice too that only one of the available options will be downloaded; this would not be the case without ''@when'' and ''@else'', as the next example shows.
In this example, although it appears that the fallback will not be used if COLRv1 is supported, in fact both fonts will be downloaded, which wastes bandwidth if it is not used. The fallback might still be used for some characters; for example, if the color font supports only Latin, while the fallback supports Latin and Greek.
    @font-face { font-family: icons; src: url(icons-fallback.woff2);
    @supports font-tech(color-COLRv1) {
        @font-face { font-family: icons; src: url(icons-gradient-var.woff2); }
    }
    

Security Considerations

No Security issues have been raised against this document

Privacy Considerations

No Privacy issues have been raised against this document

Acknowledgments

The @when and @else rules are based on a proposal by Tab Atkins.

Changes

Changes since the First Public Working Draft of 3 March 2020

  • Renamed font-technology to font-tech
  • Added some examples
  • Added @when and @else per CSSWG resolution
  • Extended @supports feature to express font capabilities
  • Added two co-editors per CSSWG resolution
  • Added Privacy and Security sections