[css-flexbox] Update changes list

Author: fantasai

css-flexbox/Overview.bs

@@ -3444,7 +3444,7 @@ Changes since the 26 May 2016 CR</h3>
 Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 
 	<ul>
-		<li id="change-2017-box-sizing-basis">
+		<li id="change-2016-box-sizing-basis">
 			To allow flex factors to actually represent absolute ratios of flex item sizes
 			as was originally intended (see various examples),
 			removed the flooring of content-box sizes at zero
@@ -3482,7 +3482,7 @@ Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 					it's a max violation.
 					If the item's <a>target main size</a> was made larger by this,
 			</blockquote>
-		<li id="change-2017-max-contribution">
+		<li id="change-2016-max-contribution">
 			To prevent empty flex items in shrink-to-fit containers
 			from collapsing to zero even when given a specified size,
 			the specified size is now accounted for in calculating
@@ -3496,7 +3496,7 @@ Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 				and/or as a minimum (if it is not shrinkable),
 				and then further clamped by its <a lt="min main size property">min</a>/<a>max main size properties</a>.
 			</blockquote>
-		<li id="change-2017-definite-basis">
+		<li id="change-2016-definite-basis">
 			Since at least two implementations ended up
 			allowing percentages inside flex items with indefinite flex basis to resolve anyway,
 			removed the condition requiring definite flex basis.
@@ -3512,10 +3512,23 @@ Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 			For ease of implementation, ''align-self/auto'' value of 'align-self' now computes to itself always.
 			See <a href="change-2015-align-self-auto">related previous change</a>
 			requiring this computation for absolutely-positioned elements.
-			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440">Issue 440</a>)
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440">Issue 440</a>,
+			<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/644">Issue 644</a>)
+			<blockquote>
+				<table class="data">
+				<tr><th>Computed value: <td><del><a value for=align-self>auto</a> computes to parent's 'align-items' value; otherwise</del> as specified
+				</table>
+				&hellip;
+				<p><del>On absolutely positioned elements,
+				a value of ''align-self/auto' computes to itself.
+				On all other elements, a value of ''aligh-self/auto'' for 'align-self'
+				computes to the value of 'align-items' on the element’s parent,
+				or ''align-self/stretch'' if the element has no parent.</del>
+			</blockquote>
 		<li id="change-2016-baseline-alignment">
 			Change <a>flex items</a> in orthogonal flows and <a>flex items</a> without a baseline
 			to both synthesize their alignment baseline from the <a>flex item</a>’s border box.
+			(<a href="">Issue XXX</a>)
 		<li id="change-2016-main-cross-baseline">
 			Fix main/cross error in definition of <a>cross-axis baseline set</a>.
 			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792">Issue 792</a>)
@@ -3551,6 +3564,7 @@ Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 		<li>When clamping by the <a>max main size property</a>
 			in the <a href="#intrinsic-main-sizes">calculation of the flex container’s intrinsic size</a>,
 			be sure to floor by the <a>min main size property</a>.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361">Issue 361</a>)
 			<blockquote>
 				<p>Within each line,
 				find the largest <var>max-content flex fraction</var>
@@ -3562,15 +3576,100 @@ Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 				then clamp that result by the <a>max main size property</a>
 				<ins>floored by the <a>min main size property</a></ins>.</p>
 			</blockquote>
+		<li id="change-2016-abspos-no-order-fix">
+			Added missing edits for <a href="#change-2016-abspos-no-order">change</a>
+			that made 'order' not apply to absolutely-positioned children of a flex container.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1439">Issue 1439</a>)
+			<blockquote>
+				<table class="data">
+					<tr><th>Applies to: <td><a>flex items</a> <del>and absolutely-positioned children of <a>flex containers</a></del>
+				</table>
+				<p>
+					The 'order' property controls the order in which
+					<del>children of a flex container</del> <ins>flex items</ins>
+					appear within the flex container,
+					by assigning them to ordinal groups.
+					&hellip;
+				</p>
+				<p>
+					<ins>Absolutely-positioned children of a <a>flex container</a>
+					are treated as having ''order: 0''
+					for the purpose of determining their painting order relative to <a>flex items</a>.</ins>
+				</p>
+			</blockquote>
+			<blockquote>
+				Unless otherwise specified by a future specification,
+				this property has no effect on boxes that are not
+				<del>children of a <a>flex container</a></del> <ins><a>flex items</a></ins>.
+			</blockquote>
+		<li id="change-2016-flex-direction-baseline">
+			Take 'flex-direction' into account when determining first/last baseline of the flex container.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995">Issue 995</a>)
+			<blockquote>
+				<p>
+					To this end,
+					the baselines of a flex container are determined as follows
+					(after reordering with 'order'<ins>,
+					and taking 'flex-direction' into account</ins>):
+				</p>
+				<p>&hellip;</p>
+				<ol>
+					<li>
+						If any of the <a>flex items</a> on the flex container's
+						<del>first/last</del> <ins>startmost/endmost</ins> <a>flex line</a>
+						<a href="#baseline-participation">participate in baseline alignment</a>,
+						the flex container's first/last <a>main-axis baseline set</a> &hellip;
+					<li>
+						Otherwise, if the flex container has at least one <a>flex item</a>,
+						the flex container's first/last <a>main-axis baseline set</a>
+						is <a lt="generate baselines">generated</a> from
+						the <a>alignment baseline</a> of the
+						<del>first/last</del> <ins>startmost/endmost</ins> <a>flex item</a>.
+						&hellip;
+					<li>
+						Otherwise, the flex container has no first/last main-axis <a>baseline set</a>, &hellip;
+				</ol>
+				<p>&hellip;</p>
+				<ol>
+					<li>
+						If the flex container has at least one <a>flex item</a>,
+						the flex container's first/last <a>cross-axis baseline set</a>
+						is <a lt="generate baselines">generated</a> from
+						the <a>alignment baseline</a> of the
+						<del>first/last</del> <ins>startmost/endmost</ins> <a>flex item</a>.
+						&hellip;
+				</ol>
+			</blockquote>
+		<li id="change-2016-space-between-single-line">
+			Define ''align-content: space-between'' handling of a single <a>flex line</a>
+			as equivalent to ''align-content/start''.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718">Issue 718</a>)
+			<blockquote>
+				<p>
+					Lines are evenly distributed in the flex container.
+					If the leftover free-space is negative
+					<ins>or there is only a single <a>flex line</a> in the flex container,</ins>
+		 			this value is identical to <a value for=align-content>flex-start</a>.
+		 	</blockquote>
+		<li id="change-2016-axis-error">
+			Fixed error in <a href="#axis-mapping">axis mapping table</a>.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/205">Issue 205</a>)
+		<li id="change-2016-reword-min-auto-fix">
+			Restored definition of the <a>automatic minimum size</a>
+			of boxes with neither <a>specified size</a> nor <a>aspect ratio</a>,
+			which was lost in earlier <a href="#change-2016-reword-min-auto">rewrite</a>.
+			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/671">Issue 671</a>)
 	</ul>
 
 <h4 id="change-201605-clarify">
 Clarifications</h4>
 	<ul>
-		<li>Made sure that <a>main size</a> and <a>cross size</a> are defined
+		<li id="change-2016-main-cross-def">
+			Made sure that <a>main size</a> and <a>cross size</a> are defined
 			for <a>flex containers</a> as well as for <a>flex items</a>.
 			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981">Issue 981</a>)
-		<li>Tweaked final clarifying sentence of note about spatial navigation.
+		<li id="change-2016-broken-spatial-note">
+			Tweaked final clarifying sentence of note about spatial navigation.
 			(<a href="https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677">Issue 1677</a>)
 			<blockquote>
 				<p class="note">
@@ -3588,6 +3687,7 @@ Clarifications</h4>
 					A well-implemented spatial navigation feature would need to consider
 					all the layout features of CSS that modify spatial relationships.</ins>
 			</blockquote>
+		<li>Miscellaneous trivial editorial improvements.
 	</ul>
 
 <h3 id="changes-20160301">
@@ -3633,7 +3733,7 @@ Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 			(<a href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/issues-cr-20160301#issue-13">Issue 13</a>))
 	</ul>
 
-<h4 id="change-201604-clarify">
+<h4 id="change-201603-clarify">
 Clarifications</h4>
 
 	<ul>
@@ -4319,7 +4419,8 @@ Clarifications</h4>
 			</blockquote>
 
 		<li id="change-201403-abspos-ordering">
-			Clarified application of 'order' to absolutely-positioned children of the <a>flex container</a>:
+			Clarified application of 'order' to absolutely-positioned children of the <a>flex container</a>.
+			(Note, this behavior was later <a href="#change-2016-abspos-no-order">rescinded</a>.)
 
 			<blockquote>
 				<p>An absolutely-positioned child of a flex container does not participate in flex layout

css-flexbox/issues-cr-20160526.bsi

@@ -423,3 +423,11 @@ Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803#issuecomment-329247658
 Closed:   Accepted
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
+Issue 46.
+Summary:  Restore deleted def for auto min size w/o specified size or aspect ratio
+From:     Shing Lyu
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/671
+Response: https://github.com/shinglyu/csswg-drafts/commit/7d64cfb5c3ad1cabacc3e0d00f72c3717d2a1ef3
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----

css-flexbox/issues-cr-20160526.html

@@ -455,6 +455,14 @@ <h1>CSS Flexible Box Layout Disposition of Comments for 2016-05-26 CR</h1>
 <span>Response: <a href='https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803#issuecomment-329247658'>https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803#issuecomment-329247658</a></span>
 <span class="a">Closed:   Accepted</span>
 <span>Resolved: Editorial</span></pre>
+<pre class=' a' id='issue-46'>
+<span>Issue 46. <a href='#issue-46'>#</a></span>
+<span>Summary:  Restore deleted def for auto min size w/o specified size or aspect ratio</span>
+<span>From:     Shing Lyu</span>
+<span>Comment:  <a href='https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/671'>https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/671</a></span>
+<span>Response: <a href='https://github.com/shinglyu/csswg-drafts/commit/7d64cfb5c3ad1cabacc3e0d00f72c3717d2a1ef3'>https://github.com/shinglyu/csswg-drafts/commit/7d64cfb5c3ad1cabacc3e0d00f72c3717d2a1ef3</a></span>
+<span class="a">Closed:   Accepted</span>
+<span>Resolved: Bugfix</span></pre>
 <script>
 (function () {
 	var sheet = document.styleSheets[0];