File tree Expand file tree Collapse file tree
Expand file tree Collapse file tree Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -668,8 +668,13 @@ <h3 id="exclusions-implementation-note">Exclusions implementation note</h3>
668668 < a href ="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083 "> Bug-15083</ a >
669669 </ div >
670670 < p class ="issue ">
671- This is a placeholder for David Baron's issue about processing and positioning model
672- of CSS Exclusions.
671+ The rules for exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely positioned elements
672+ (particularly those with static position) build this exclusions model on top of
673+ the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2, rather than on top of floats, the
674+ existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1 and 2. The CSS Working Group has not reached
675+ consensus on whether it intends to base the new exclusions features in this specification
676+ on top of absolute positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on
677+ top of floats.
673678 </ p >
674679
675680 < p > < em > This section is not normative.</ em > </ p >
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change 6464
6565 < h1 id =css-exclusions-module > CSS Exclusions and Shapes Module Level 3</ h1 >
6666
67- < h2 class ="no-num no-toc " id =longstatus-date > Editor's Draft 14 December
67+ < h2 class ="no-num no-toc " id =longstatus-date > Editor's Draft 30 December
6868 2011</ h2 >
6969
7070 < dl >
7171 < dt > This version:
7272
7373 < dd > < a
7474 href ="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/ "> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/</ a > </ dd >
75- <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/ED-css3-exclusions-20111214 /">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-exclusions-20111214 /</a></dd>-->
75+ <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/ED-css3-exclusions-20111230 /">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-exclusions-20111230 /</a></dd>-->
7676
7777 < dt > Latest version:
7878
@@ -1021,9 +1021,15 @@ <h3 id=exclusions-implementation-note><span class=secno>3.5.
10211021 < div class =issue-marker > < a
10221022 href ="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083 "> Bug-15083</ a > </ div >
10231023
1024- < p class =issue id =this-is-a-placeholder-for-david-barons-i > This is a
1025- placeholder for David Baron's issue about processing and positioning model
1026- of CSS Exclusions.
1024+ < p class =issue id =the-rules-for-exclusions-order-and-exclu > The rules for
1025+ exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely positioned elements
1026+ (particularly those with static position) build this exclusions model on
1027+ top of the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2, rather than on top
1028+ of floats, the existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1 and 2. The CSS
1029+ Working Group has not reached consensus on whether it intends to base the
1030+ new exclusions features in this specification on top of absolute
1031+ positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on top of
1032+ floats.
10271033
10281034 < p id =this-section-is-not-normative.0 > < em > This section is not
10291035 normative.</ em >
You can’t perform that action at this time.
0 commit comments