From be36a01c71be145c483b672bd3f370a1e8369862 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralph Whitbeck Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:09:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Ajax: Updated copy to fix opinionated statements, made them to be more general. Fixes #555 --- page/ajax/jquery-ajax-methods.md | 4 +--- page/ajax/key-concepts.md | 5 ++--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/page/ajax/jquery-ajax-methods.md b/page/ajax/jquery-ajax-methods.md index 5629c93f..096fee62 100644 --- a/page/ajax/jquery-ajax-methods.md +++ b/page/ajax/jquery-ajax-methods.md @@ -10,9 +10,7 @@ While jQuery does offer many Ajax-related convenience methods, the core imperative. We'll review it first, and then touch briefly on the convenience methods. -I generally use the `$.ajax()` method and do not use convenience methods. As -you'll see, it offers features that the convenience methods do not, and its -syntax is more easily understandable, in my opinion. +It's often considered good practice to use the `$.ajax()` method over the jQuery provided [convenience methods](#convenience-methods). As you'll see, it offers features that the convenience methods do not, and its syntax allows for the ease of readability. ### `$.ajax()` diff --git a/page/ajax/key-concepts.md b/page/ajax/key-concepts.md index bf393129..43e59cc6 100644 --- a/page/ajax/key-concepts.md +++ b/page/ajax/key-concepts.md @@ -63,9 +63,8 @@ For transporting JSON data from another domain. For transporting data in a custom XML schema. -I am a strong proponent of using the JSON format in most cases, as it provides -the most flexibility. It is especially useful for sending both HTML and data at -the same time. +Consider using the JSON format in most cases, as it provides +the most flexibility. It is especially useful for sending both HTML and data at the same time. ### A is for Asynchronous