find: Improve wording

Fixes jquerygh-395
Closes jquerygh-423

Author: AurelioDeRosa

entries/find.xml

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ $( "li.item-ii" ).find( "li" ).css( "background-color", "red" );
     </code></pre>
     <p>The result of this call is a red background on items A, B, 1, 2, 3, and C. Even though item II matches the selector expression, it is not included in the results; only descendants are considered candidates for the match.</p>
     <div class="warning">
-      <p>Unlike in the rest of the tree traversal methods, the selector expression is required in a call to <code>.find()</code>. If we need to retrieve all of the descendant elements, we can pass in the universal selector <code>'*'</code> to accomplish this.</p>
+      <p>Unlike most of the tree traversal methods, the selector expression is required in a call to <code>.find()</code>. If we need to retrieve all of the descendant elements, we can pass in the universal selector <code>'*'</code> to accomplish this.</p>
     </div>
     <p><a href="/jquery/#selector-context">Selector context</a> is implemented with the <code>.find()</code> <code>method;</code> therefore, <code>$( "li.item-ii" ).find( "li" )</code> is equivalent to <code>$( "li", "li.item-ii" )</code>.</p>
     <p><strong>As of jQuery 1.6</strong>, we can also filter the selection with a given jQuery collection or element. With the same nested list as above, if we start with:</p>