-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
Using as modular components #44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
pardon me, but how is it "fairly easy fix"? 🤔 is that.... every js file needs to have it's own import even though it's already imported by the parent? |
The only issue is with component.js and people in the linked thread have made forks that fix this (from the looks of things) |
That would be very good if users can import the pieces they only need. |
It's pretty much already there, there's just an issue with the component file. There's workarounds in the linked thread but those shouldn't be needed |
That's what I meant, would be good to have this resolved so they can use this feature without any issues. So I guess it is a bugfix then or did it prevent the usage of the imports at all and it's a new feature? |
I've been using them as modules for a while but it was never intentionally supported to my knowledge, just a side effect of the structure. |
Added to 2.0 milestone as it is not worth the time for a v1 update |
I think this can be marked as solved due to the usage of typescript. Wdyt @danice ? |
I agree. The original request was about the difficulty of finding component dependencies and this is explicit now. |
There's been a long-standing issue when trying to import parts of materialize individually (Dogfalo#5958) and from what others are saying it should be a fairly easy fix. Any thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: