Now contains all comments on www-style between the publication date

and today (Mar 14).

Author: bert-github

css3-background/issues-lc-2012.txt

@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-background-20120214/
 Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted
 Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
 
+Currently lists all comments on www-style between Feb 14 (publication
+date) and Mar 13, 2012 (comment deadline was Mar 6).
+
 Issue 1.
 Summary:  Add background-position-x and background-position-y
 From:     Florian Rivoal
@@ -131,10 +134,43 @@ From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0124.html
 Proposal: editorial, editors to decide
 
+Issue:    21
+Summary:  Unclear what border style is used on table cells, when
+	  'border-image-source' doesn't apply
+From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
+Proposal: Not clear what it is that Kenny finds unclear. Need to ask him.
+
+Issue:    22
+Summary:  How exactly does border-image apply to table elements with
+	  collapsing borders (border conflict resolution)?
+From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
+Proposal: Leave undefined? Exclude? Image wins over all styles except 'hidden'?
 
-Still to do:
+Issue 23
+Summary:  Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables
+From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0106.html
+Proposal: Editorial (because it seems everybody interpreted it the right
+	  way anyway), editors decide
 
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0106.html
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0103.html
-  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1338.html
+Issue 24
+Summary:  Line thickness in 4.3 uses ambiguous words “may not”
+	  (“may not be negative”)
+From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0103.html
+Proposal: Change to “must not” or “is illegal”
+
+Issue 25
+Summary:  Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers.
+	  Tab says (1st response) it's no longer needed, because you
+	  can soon use 'image(red)' anywhere a URL is allowed, and (2nd
+	  response) that it would throw off the layer counting for the
+	  'background-color' property.
+From:     Lev Solntsev
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1338.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1341.html
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1365.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1373.html
+Proposal: No change