Remove links to nowhere. Update issues list.

Author: fantasai

css3-images/Overview.html

@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@
 
    <h1>CSS Image Values and Replaced Content Module Level 3</h1>
 
-   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 21 March 2012</h2>
+   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 23 March 2012</h2>
 
    <dl>
     <dt>This Version:
 
     <dd><a
      href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/</a>
-     <!-- <dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-images-20120321/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-images-20120321/</a>-->
+     <!-- <dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/ED-css3-images-20120323/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-images-20120323/</a>-->
 
 
     <dt>Latest Version:
@@ -1686,9 +1686,7 @@ <h3 id=sizing-terms><span class=secno>5.1. </span> Object-Sizing
     class=property>background-size</code>&rsquo; properties. The specified
     size may be a width and/or a height, or alternately a "cover" or
     "contain" constraint. Additionally, the specified size may have a
-    horizontal or vertical "rounding" constraint. A <a>later section</a> of
-    this spec defines how the specified size is determined for various
-    contexts.
+    horizontal or vertical "rounding" constraint.
 
    <dt><dfn id=concrete-object-size>concrete object size</dfn>
 
@@ -1707,8 +1705,7 @@ <h3 id=sizing-terms><span class=secno>5.1. </span> Object-Sizing
      href="#concrete-object-size"><i>concrete object size</i></a> when both
      the <a href="#intrinsic-dimensions"><i>intrinsic dimensions</i></a> and
      <a href="#specified-size"><i>specified size</i></a> are missing
-     dimensions. A <a>later section</a> of this spec defines how the default
-     object size is determined for various contexts.</p>
+     dimensions.
   </dl>
 
   <h4 id=specified-and-default-sizes><span class=secno>5.1.1. </span>

css3-images/Overview.src.html

@@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ <h3 id="sizing-terms">
 		</dd>
 
 		<dt><dfn>specified size</dfn></dt>
-		<dd>The specified size of an object is a set of constraints given by CSS, such as through the 'width' and 'height' or 'background-size' properties.  The specified size may be a width and/or a height, or alternately a "cover" or "contain" constraint.  Additionally, the specified size may have a horizontal or vertical "rounding" constraint.  A <a>later section</a> of this spec defines how the specified size is determined for various contexts.</dd>
+		<dd>The specified size of an object is a set of constraints given by CSS, such as through the 'width' and 'height' or 'background-size' properties.  The specified size may be a width and/or a height, or alternately a "cover" or "contain" constraint.  Additionally, the specified size may have a horizontal or vertical "rounding" constraint.</dd>
 
 		<dt><dfn>concrete object size</dfn></dt>
 		<dd>The <i>concrete object size</i> is the result of combining an object's <i>intrinsic dimensions</i> and <i>specified size</i> with the <i>default object size</i> of the context it's used in, producing a rectangle with a definite width and height.</dd>
@@ -1072,7 +1072,6 @@ <h3 id="sizing-terms">
 			<p>The <i>default object size</i> is a rectangle with a definite height and 
 			width used to determine the <i>concrete object size</i> when both the 
 			<i>intrinsic dimensions</i> and <i>specified size</i> are missing dimensions.  
-			A <a>later section</a> of this spec defines how the default object size is determined for various contexts.</p>
 		</dd>
 	</dl>
 

css3-images/issues-lc-2012.txt

@@ -25,48 +25,54 @@ Summary:  Use of 'bounding box' is undefined, should be 'border box'
 From:     Leif Arne Storset
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0033.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1386.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
 Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1399.html
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 4.
 Summary:  'element reference identifier' underdefined
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0253.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 5.
 Summary:  The element() cycle detection algo phrasing implies an incremental
           algorithm.
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0251.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0269.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 6.
 Summary:  The element() cycle detection algo misses cycles caused by
           host-language elements.
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0254.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0270.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 7.
 Summary:  The term "paint sources" is insufficiently defined, and should
           have explicit definitions for HTML and SVG.
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0252.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0264.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 8.
 Summary:  HTML's definition of "paint source" only exists in the WHATWG
           version of HTML5, so it should be directly linked to.
 From:     Leif Arne Storset
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0267.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0271.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 9.
 Summary:  'image-orientation' should be applied before any other transformations
@@ -88,14 +94,16 @@ Summary:  element() examples still used old IDENT syntax.
 From:     Kenny Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 12.
 Summary:  specify element() behavior when the selector matches multiple elements
 From:     Kenny Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 13.
 Summary:  specify that relative image() urls compute to absolute
@@ -134,8 +142,7 @@ Summary:  element() function should move to the next level of Images
 From:     Simon Fraser
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0324.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0347.html
-Closed:   Rejected
-Verified: (Verified as part of in-person discussion during the February CSSWG f2f.)
+Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 18.
 Summary:  Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical units,
@@ -175,7 +182,8 @@ Summary:  There should be a non-example reference to CSSElementMap
 From:     Simon Fraser
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0268.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0266.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 23.
 Summary:  Wording of 'object-fit:fill' seems to imply that the content box
@@ -191,7 +199,10 @@ From:     Leif Arne Storset
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0036.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0098.html
 Note:     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0638.html
-Open.
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1122.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0517.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0525.html
 ----
 Issue 25.
 Summary:  "Concentric ellipses" is imprecise
@@ -230,8 +241,9 @@ Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1124.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1137.html
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1265.html
-Closed:   Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted+Deferred
 Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1330.html
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 30.
 Summary:  Style resolution of elements not in document
@@ -245,13 +257,15 @@ Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1288.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1350.html
 Closed:   ???
 Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1356.html
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 31.
 Summary:  Define precisely how SVG paint servers are used as paint sources
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html (bottom)
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1265.html (bottom)
 Closed:   Accepted
 Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1330.html (bottom)
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 32.
 Summary:  objectBoundingBox and userSpaceOnUse are defined to be identical
@@ -267,7 +281,9 @@ Summary:  aliasing of object-fit/object-position
 From:     Erik Dahlstrom
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1126.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1127.html
-Open.
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0518.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0526.html
 ----
 Issue 34.
 Summary:  element() and 3D Transforms
@@ -276,27 +292,32 @@ Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1294.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1297.html
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1325.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1334.html
-Open.
+Closed:   Deferred to Level 4.
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 35.
 Summary:  GCPM element() and Images element()
 From:     fantasai / Håkon Lie
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1430.html
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1433.html
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0012.html
-Open.
+Closed:   Deferred to Level 4
+Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 36.
 Summary:  Clarify scope of required Media Fragments support for image()
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0152.html
-Open.
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0493.html
+Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 37.
 Summary:  ltr/rtl annotations should be per image() not per URL
 From:     Kenny Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0243.html
-Open.
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0519.html
+Closed:   Deferred to Level 4
+Deferred: The directional images feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 38.
 Summary:  Default object size for replaced elements is incorrect
@@ -323,13 +344,16 @@ Issue 41.
 Summary:  Combine directional images into image-orientation
 From:     Kenny Luck
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0397.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0513.html
 Note:     See also Issue 37
-Open
+Closed:   Deferred to Level 4
+Deferred: The directional images feature has been deferred to Level 4.
 ----
 Issue 42.
 Summary:  image-orientation should inherit
 From:     Kenny Luck
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0397.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0513.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 43.
@@ -351,14 +375,16 @@ Summary:  Define closest aspect ratio more precisely
 From:     Øyvind Stenhaug
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0402.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0498.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0527.html
 ----
 Issue 46.
 Summary:  Accessibility Review
 From:     Michael Cooper
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0361.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0366.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0368.html
-Closed:   (Mostly) Accepted
+Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 47.
 Summary:  Interaction of object-fit and default sizing algorithm is messy
@@ -372,14 +398,16 @@ Issue 48.
 Summary:  SVG with one intrinsic dimension and an aspect ratio
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0364.html
-???
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0415.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0496.html
+Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 49.
 Summary:  object-fit's resizing behavior doesn't account for mixed min/max constraints
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0369.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0370.html
-Open.
+Closed:   Invalid via Issue 24 edits
 ----
 Issue 50.
 Summary:  image-orientation application unclear wrt background / 'content' images
@@ -402,7 +430,7 @@ Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0365.html
 Open.
 ----
 Issue 52.
-Summary:  Remove out-of-document element references
+Summary:  Remove out-of-document element references feature
 From:     Tab Atkins and fantasai
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0477.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0487.html