[css-flexbox] Whoops, 'either' should be 'neither' margin, for determining stretch. Also fix some links.

--HG--
extra : rebase_source : bf1a97c1351b881cf56f9204de331802d013c42d

Author: tabatkins

css-flexbox/Overview.bs

@@ -1700,7 +1700,7 @@ The 'flex-basis' property</h4>
 		The <dfn value for=flex-basis>main-size</dfn> keyword, when specified on a <i>flex item</i>,
 		retrieves the value of the <i>main size property</i>.
 
-	<div class="issue">
+	<div class="issue" id="issue-auto-name">
 		This value was originally named ''auto'',
 		but that was problematic because it left us with no keyword to represent an automatic flex basis.
 		There were two options for fixing this:
@@ -2049,7 +2049,7 @@ Cross-axis Alignment: the 'align-items' and 'align-self' properties</h3>
 		<dt><dfn>stretch</dfn>
 		<dd>
 			If the <i>cross size property</i> of the <i>flex item</i> computes to ''width/auto'',
-			and either of the <a>cross-axis</a> margins are ''margin/auto'',
+			and neither of the <a>cross-axis</a> margins are ''margin/auto'',
 			the <a>flex item</a> is <dfn dfn for=''>stretched</dfn>.
 			Its used value is the length necessary to make the <i>cross size</i> of the item's margin box as close to the same size as the line as possible,
 			while still respecting the constraints imposed by 'min-height'/'min-width'/'max-height'/'max-width'.
@@ -3191,7 +3191,7 @@ Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 			<blockquote>
 				<p>On a <a>flex item</a> whose 'overflow' is not ''overflow/visible'',
 				<ins>the following table gives the minimum size:
-				<a href="#valdef-min-width-min-height-auto"><strong>[see table]</strong></a></ins><br>
+				<a value for="min-width" title="auto"><strong>[see table]</strong></a></ins><br>
 				<del>this keyword specifies as the minimum size the smaller of:</del></p>
 				<del>
 					<ul>
@@ -3237,7 +3237,7 @@ Substantive Changes and Bugfixes</h4>
 				<p><del>Except for auto, which retrieves the value of the main size property,</del> &hellip;
 			</blockquote>
 
-			<p>See <a href="#issue-753aff05">further discussion</a> on this issue
+			<p>See <a href="#issue-auto-name">further discussion</a> on this issue
 			and a proposed alternative to solving the same problem.
 
 		<li id="change-201403-definite-flexing">
@@ -3331,7 +3331,7 @@ Clarifications</h4>
 
 		<li id="change-201403-abspos-ordering">
 			Clarified application of 'order' to absolutely-positioned children of the <i>flex container</i>:
-	
+
 			<blockquote>
 				<p>An absolutely-positioned child of a flex container does not participate in flex layout
 				<del>beyond the reordering step</del>.