added svg in img isolation at risk

Author: Rik Cabanier

compositing-1/Compositing.src.html

@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="status">Status of This Document</h2>
     <p>The following features are at risk:<p>
       <ol>
         <li>The <a href="#isolation">'isolation'</a> property</li>
+        <li><a href="#img_isolation">isolation'</a> if SVG images using the 'img' element.</li>
       </ol> 
 
 <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id="contents">Table of contents</h2>
@@ -765,7 +766,7 @@ <h4 id="isolation">The <span class="prop-name">'isolation'</span> property</h4>
 </div>
 <p>The syntax of the property of <var>&lt;isolation-mode&gt;</var> is given with:</p>
 <pre class="isolated"><dfn id="isolated-propid"><var>&lt;isolation-mode&gt;</var></dfn> = auto | isolate</pre>
-<p>
+<p id="img_isolation">
 In CSS, a background image or the content of an &lt;img&gt; must always be rendered into an isolated group.<br/>For instance, if you link to an SVG file through the 'img' tag, the artwork of that SVG will not blend with the backdrop of the content.</p>
 <p>
 In SVG, <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/masking.html#Masking">'mask'</a> always creates an isolated group.

compositing-1/index.html

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
    rel=dcterms.rights>
   <meta content="Compositing and Blending Level 1" name=dcterms.title>
   <meta content=text name=dcterms.type>
-  <meta content=2013-12-03 name=dcterms.date>
+  <meta content=2013-12-11 name=dcterms.date>
   <meta content="Rik Cabanier" name=dcterms.creator>
   <meta content="Nikos Andronikos" name=dcterms.creator>
   <meta content=W3C name=dcterms.publisher>
@@ -231,15 +231,15 @@
 
    <h1>Compositing and Blending Level 1</h1>
 
-   <h2 class="no-num no-toc">Editor's Draft 3 December 2013</h2>
+   <h2 class="no-num no-toc">Editor's Draft 11 December 2013</h2>
 
    <dl>
     <dt>This version:
 
     <dd> <a
      href="http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/compositing-1/">http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/compositing-1/</a>
      <!--
-        <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-compositing-1-20131203/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-compositing-1-20131203/</a>
+        <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-compositing-1-20131211/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-compositing-1-20131211/</a>
         -->
 
     <dt>Latest version:
@@ -369,6 +369,9 @@ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=status>Status of This Document</h2>
   <ol>
    <li>The <a href="#isolation">‘<code
     class=property>isolation</code>’</a> property
+
+   <li><a href="#img_isolation">isolation'</a> if SVG images using the
+    ‘<code class=property>img</code>’ element.
   </ol>
 
   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=contents>Table of contents</h2>
@@ -1181,8 +1184,8 @@ <h4 id=isolation><span class=secno>3.4.2. </span>The <span
   <pre class=isolated><dfn
    id=isolated-propid><var>&lt;isolation-mode&gt;</var></dfn> = auto | isolate</pre>
 
-  <p> In CSS, a background image or the content of an &lt;img&gt; must always
-   be rendered into an isolated group.<br>
+  <p id="img_isolation"> In CSS, a background image or the content of an
+   &lt;img&gt; must always be rendered into an isolated group.<br>
    For instance, if you link to an SVG file through the ‘<code
    class=property>img</code>’ tag, the artwork of that SVG will not blend
    with the backdrop of the content.

compositing-1/issues-lc-2013.html

@@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ <h2 id=lc2013>Comments on draft of 10 October 2013</h2>
 <p>This document is the disposition of comments on the Compositing and Blending 
 CR sent to the www-style, public-fx and www-svg mailing lists. The Compositing and Blending CR was 
 published <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-css3-mediaqueries-20020708/">10 October 2013</a>.
-
+<!--
 <p>The following color coding convention is used for comments:</p>
 
 <ul>
  <li class=a>The CSS WG agreed with the reviewer.
  <li class=r>The CSS WG disagreed with the reviewer.
  <li class=fo>The CSS WG disagreed with the reviewer and the reviewer raised a Formal Objection.
 </ul>
-
+-->
 <p>(There were no formal objections.)</p>
 
 <table>
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ <h2 id=lc2013>Comments on draft of 10 October 2013</h2>
 This is a request for a non-normative change. This will be done during the CR process.
 </p>
 
+
 <tr><th colspan=3 class=source><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2013Dec/0018.html">Comment</a> from Chris Lilley on Fri, 6 Dec 2013; <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2013Dec/0019.html">answer on www-svg</a>.
 
 <tr><td>4<td>
@@ -132,6 +133,28 @@ <h2 id=lc2013>Comments on draft of 10 October 2013</h2>
 major changes in the way browsers draw.
 It will be back for level 2 and either we will change the model so it can
 be implemented or we convince the browsers to redo their graphics engines.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+This is a feature request for level 2 of blending and compositing or filters.
+</p>
+
+<tr><th colspan=3 class=source><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2013OctDec/0172.html">Comment</a> from Tavmjong Bah on Tue, 10 Dec 2013; <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2013OctDec/0181.html">answer on public-fx</a>.
+
+<tr><td>5<td>
+<p>It appears that the three circles are being blended in one
+isolation group and then put over the gray background. What is causing
+the circles to be isolated? If the SVG is referenced from an <img> then
+it should be isolated but if it is included inline then it should not
+be(?). If I try the SVG in Chrome the circles are never isolated, no
+matter what I do (stand-alone SVG, external SVG, inline). Is this due to
+a lack of isolation support in Chrome
+<p>
+
+<td>
+<p>
+You're correct that this currently doesn't isolate. I will put this feature
+at risk.
 </p>
 
     </tr>