Added resolutions by Elika and me for most issues. Cleaned up a bit.

Author: bert-github

css3-background/issues-lc-2012.txt

@@ -26,35 +26,40 @@ Issue:    3
 Summary:  Reorder the border-*-radius definitions in the spec
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Response: [to be sent]
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
 Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: Edited
 
 Issue:    4
 Summary:  “Applies to” for 'border-radius' doesn't match prose
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Response: [to be sent]
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
 Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status:   Edited
 
 Issue:    5
 Summary:  Negative values for 'border-radius' should explicitly be illegal
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
 Response: [to be sent]
 Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status:   Edited
 
 Issue:    6
 Summary:  Rephrase note about inner curve in 5.2
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Response: [to be sent]
-Proposal: replace "adjacent corner" by "opposite side" and add an image (action Elika)
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: Elika to replace "adjacent corner" by "opposite side"
+	and add an image
 
 Issue:    7
 Summary:  Unclear text about corner transitions in 5.4
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Response: [to be sent]
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
 Proposal: (From Elika and Bert:) "Otherwise, the center
 	  of color and style transitions
 	  between adjoining borders must a point along the curve 
@@ -67,111 +72,145 @@ Issue:    8
 Summary:  Insert “corresponding” in the formula in 5.5
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Proposal: accept (editorial)
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: Edited
 
 Issue:    9
 Summary:  Remove para “The rendering must be exactly…” in 5.5
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Proposal: ?
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: Edited
 
 Issue:    10
 Summary:  Example 24 should have only images A and B, D and C are the same
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Proposal: editorial, editors to decide
+Response: [to be sent by Bert]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status:   Bert to label the images A B B A (no C and D)
 
 Issue:    11
 Summary:  Example 25 belongs in 5.1 instead of 5.6
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Proposal: accept (editorial)
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Editing status: Edited
+Closed:   Accepted
 
 Issue:    12
 Summary:  Use “{1,2}” instead of “?” in syntax of 'border-radius'
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Proposal: editorial, editors to decide
-
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: Edited
 
 Issue:    13
 Summary:  Initial value of 'border-radius' should be "see individual properties”
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
-Proposal: accept (editorial)
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: Edited
 
 Issue:    14
 Summary:  Also allow to specify corners with an <angle> instead of two <length>
 From:     Christoph Päper
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0324.html
-Proposal: reject (new features are out of scope)
+Response: [to be sent by Bert]
+Closed:   Rejected (new features are out of scope)
 
 Issue:    15
 Summary:  Add a “cut” corner style (border-corner-shape: normal|curved|sharp)
 From:     Christoph Päper
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0324.html
-Proposal: reject (new features are out of scope)
+Response: [to be sent by Bert]
+Closed:   Rejected (new features are out of scope)
 
 Issue:    16
 Summary:  'Border-image' syntax allows odd trailing slash
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0179.html
-Proposal: (Kenny's solution C probably has minimal impact)
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted (solution C)
+Editing status: edited, but needs to be verified by WG
 
 Issue:    17
 Summary:  'background' shorthand spec text fails to say that bg-image is reset.
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0134.html
-Proposal: Invalid (whether bg-image is reset to default first is
-          unimportant,
-          because it is always set to something by the shorthand.)
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: edited
 
 Issue:    18
 Summary:  Which background and border properties apply to first-line
           and first-letter?
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0133.html
-Proposal: ?
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: edited
 
 Issue:    19
 Summary:  Background of page area
 From:     Fantasai
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0127.html
-Proposal: OutOfScope (is an issue for css3-page)
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   OutOfScope (is an issue for css3-page)
 
 Issue:    20
 Summary:  Rewording and more verbose grammar for bg-position
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0124.html
-Proposal: editorial, editors to decide
+Response: [to be sent by Bert: better text and note added, no grammar change]
+Closed:   Accepted (partially)
+Editing status: edited
 
 Issue:    21
 Summary:  Unclear what border style is used on table cells, when
 	  'border-image-source' doesn't apply
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
-Proposal: Not clear what it is that Kenny finds unclear. Need to ask him.
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: Elika to add "(or doesn't apply)" after "cannot be displayed"
 
 Issue:    22
 Summary:  How exactly does border-image apply to table elements with
 	  collapsing borders (border conflict resolution)?
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0109.html
-Proposal: Leave undefined? Exclude? Image wins over all styles except 'hidden'?
+Response: [to be sent by Elika, with the edit already made and the
+	  two options below]
+Proposal: Two options: draw the table borders with invisible ink and
+	  then draw the image on top of it; or an image border overrides
+	  any other border in the conflict resolution. The difference
+	  is the calculation of the width of each cell.
+Editing status: Elika added "otherwise the element's borders
+	  are invisble and the border image is drawn". Otherwise waiting
+	  for the resolution of the two options above.
 
 Issue 23
 Summary:  Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0106.html
-Proposal: Editorial (because it seems everybody interpreted it the right
-	  way anyway), editors decide
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: edited (copied wording from CSS 2.1: "In the collapsing
+	  border model, drawn the same as 'ridge'.")
 
 Issue 24
 Summary:  Line thickness in 4.3 uses ambiguous words “may not”
 	  (“may not be negative”)
 From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0103.html
-Proposal: Change to “must not” or “is illegal”
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: edited
 
 Issue 25
 Summary:  Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers.
@@ -184,4 +223,15 @@ Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1338.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1341.html
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1365.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1373.html
-Proposal: No change
+Response: [Bert or Elika to send mail to ask for verification]
+Closed:   Rejected
+
+Issue:    26
+Summary:  What is the "boundary" of a table cell?
+From:     Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0258.html
+Response: [to be sent by Elika]
+Closed:   Accepted
+Editing status: Edited (s/boundaries/far border edges/)
+
+