[css-grid] Update DoC.

Author: tabatkins

css-grid/issues-wd-20150917.bsi

@@ -18,26 +18,26 @@ From:     Mats Palmgren
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0040.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0072.html
 Closed:   Invalid
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 3.
 Summary:  Abspos item placement in degenerate grids
 From:     Mats Palmgren
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0088.html
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0098.html
-Response: 
-Open:     ???
-Verified: 
-Resolved: 
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0131.html
+Open:     Accepted
+Verified:
+Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
 Issue 4.
 Summary:  Errors in overlarge clamping rule
 From:     Mats Palmgren
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0033.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0068.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
 Issue 5.
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ From:     Mats Palmgren
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0034.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0069.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
 Issue 6.
@@ -56,16 +56,16 @@ Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0046.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0074.html
 Closed:   OutOfScope
 Note:     Filed against CSS Sizing
-Verified: 
-Resolved: 
+Verified:
+Resolved:
 ----
 Issue 7.
 Summary:  Confusion over baseline content alignment and baseline self alignment
 From:     Javier Fernandez
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0122.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0075.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 8.
@@ -74,16 +74,16 @@ From:     Sergio Villar Senin
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0190.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0194.html
 Closed:   Invalid
-Verified: 
-Resolved: 
+Verified:
+Resolved:
 ----
 Issue 9.
 Summary:  Clarify behavior of CSS-wide keywords and reset-only longhands
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0255.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0126.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 10.
@@ -102,17 +102,17 @@ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0037.html
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0041.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0043.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 12.
 Summary:  Axis ordering 2-value vs 4-value properties
 From:     Tab and fantasai
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0212.html
-Response: 
+Response:
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
-Resolved: 
+Verified:
+Resolved:
 ----
 Issue 13.
 Summary:  Linking errors etc. for alignment properties
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0055.html
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0084.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0062.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 14.
@@ -131,16 +131,16 @@ From:     Sergio Villar Senin
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0295.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0066.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 15.
 Summary:  Example is confusing
 From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0110.html
-Response: 
+Response:
 Open
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 15.
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0323.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0131.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Editorial
 ----
 Issue 16.
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0263.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0159.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
 Issue 17.
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ From:     Menuel Rego Casasnovas
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0088.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0160.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
 Issue 18.
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ From:     Mats Palmgren
 Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0028.html
 Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0072.html
 Closed:   Accepted
-Verified: 
+Verified:
 Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
 Issue 19.