[css-flexbox] Update DoC

Author: fantasai

css-flexbox/issues-lc-20140925.txt

@@ -3,6 +3,12 @@ Title:    CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1
 
 ----
 Issue 1.
+Summary:  Use preferred size instead of max-content size
+From:     Tab Atkins
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0385.html
+Open
+----
+Issue 2.
 Summary:  Flex item handling of anonymous boxes should be normative
 From:     Alan Stearns
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0265.html
@@ -11,8 +17,112 @@ Closed:   Accepted
 Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0269.html
 Resolved: Bugfix
 ----
-Issue 2.
+Issue 3.
 Summary:  Editorial nits
 From:     Alan Stearns
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0267.html
 ----
+Issue 4.
+Summary:  Alignment shouldn't depend on number of lines, but on wrappability
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0489.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0341.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0004.html
+----
+Issue 5.
+Summary:  Clarify sizing of abspos flex containers
+From:     François Remy
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0396.html
+Response: 
+Open
+----
+Issue 6.
+Summary:  Error in stretch definition
+From:     Greg Whitworth
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0429.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0430.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 7.
+Summary:  Alias no-wrap to nowrap
+From:     Tab Atkins
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0188.html
+Open
+----
+Issue 8.
+Summary:  Error in flex container max-content definition
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0443.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0340.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 9.
+Summary:  Scaled flex shrink factor should multiply by outer, not inner, base size
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0417.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0495.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editors' discretion
+----
+Issue 10.
+Summary:  Revert 'flex-basis: auto' rename, add 'content' value instead
+From:     Rossen Atanassov
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0023.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0342.html
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0401.html
+Open:     https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0346.html
+----
+Issue 11.
+Summary:  Clarify that flex layout is writing-mode relative
+From:     Addison Phillips
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0058.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0344.html
+Open:     Waiting for verification.
+----
+Issue 12.
+Summary:  Example should state general case, put specific in parens, not vice versa
+From:     Addison Phillips
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0060.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0343.html
+Closed:   Rejected
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 13.
+Summary:  Why are there sheep?
+From:     Addison Phillips
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0059.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0064.html
+Closed:   Invalid
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 14.
+Summary:  'flex' section needs editorial love
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0066.html
+Open
+----
+Issue 15.
+Summary:  Stray references to old spec prose
+From:     Daniel Holbert
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0078.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0089.html
+Resolved: Bugfix
+----
+Issue 16.
+Summary:  'order' should affect speech/navigation order
+From:     Bo Campbell
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0119.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0121.html
+Open:     Rejected, but still under discussion by WG.
+----
+Issue 17.
+Summary:  Forced flex line breaking controls
+From:     Glen Huang
+Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0322.html
+Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0336.html
+Open:     Agenda+
+----