@@ -1036,8 +1036,7 @@ <h2 id=transition-events-><span class=secno>5. </span> Transition Events</h2>
10361036 which the transition occured (in which case the target of the event
10371037 is that pseudo-element's corresponding element), or the empty string
10381038 if the transition occurred on an element (which means the target of
1039- the event is that element). < span class =issue > The working group has
1040- not yet discussed the name of this property.</ span >
1039+ the event is that element).
10411040 </ dl >
10421041
10431042 < dt > < b > Methods</ b >
@@ -1059,6 +1058,9 @@ <h2 id=transition-events-><span class=secno>5. </span> Transition Events</h2>
10591058 < code > dispatchEvent</ code > method, though it may be called multiple
10601059 times during that phase if necessary. If called multiple times, the
10611060 final invocation takes precedence.
1061+ < p class =issue > Should new events being created still have init*Event
1062+ methods?</ p >
1063+
10621064 < div class =parameters > < b > Parameters</ b >
10631065 < div class =paramtable >
10641066 < dl >
@@ -1102,10 +1104,8 @@ <h2 id=transition-events-><span class=secno>5. </span> Transition Events</h2>
11021104 < dd > Specifies the pseudo-element on which the transition
11031105 occurred. (See the < a
11041106 href ="#Events-TransitionEvent-pseudoElement "> pseudoElement</ a >
1105- attribute.) < span class =issue > The working group has not yet
1106- discussed the name of this argument.</ span > < span
1107- class =issue > Does adding this additional argument create any
1108- compatibility problems?</ span >
1107+ attribute.) < span class =issue > Does adding this additional
1108+ argument create any compatibility problems?</ span >
11091109 </ dl >
11101110 </ div >
11111111 </ div >
0 commit comments