Update DoC

Author: fantasai

css3-flexbox/issues-lc-2012.html

@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ <h1>CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2012-06-12 LCWD<
 Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0056.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0056.html</a>
 Response: [none needed]
 Closed:   Rejected
+Verified: [commenter is editor]
 </pre>
 <pre class="r" id="issue-10">
 Issue 10. <a href="#issue-10">#</a>
@@ -142,6 +143,7 @@ <h1>CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2012-06-12 LCWD<
 Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0084.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0084.html</a>
 Response: [none needed]
 Closed:   Rejected
+Verified: [commenter is editor]
 </pre>
 <pre class="a" id="issue-13">
 Issue 13. <a href="#issue-13">#</a>
@@ -182,7 +184,7 @@ <h1>CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2012-06-12 LCWD<
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0167.html
 Open
 </pre>
-<pre class="a" id="issue-18">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-18">
 Issue 18. <a href="issue-18">#</a>
 Summary:  Absolutely-positioned flex items should not affect layout in flex container
 From:     John Hax
@@ -209,10 +211,11 @@ <h1>CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2012-06-12 LCWD<
 Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0274.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0274.html</a>
 Closed:   Accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="open" id="issue-21">
+<pre class="a" id="issue-21">
 Issue 21. <a href="issue-21">#</a>
 Summary:  Tables as flex items underdefined
 From:     fantasai
 Comment:  <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0385.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0385.html</a>
-Open
+Closed:   Accepted
+OPEN NEEDS EDITS
 </pre>

css3-flexbox/issues-lc-2012.txt

@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ From:     fantasai
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0056.html
 Response: [none needed]
 Closed:   Rejected
+Verified: [commenter is editor]
 ----
 Issue 10.
 Summary:  Flex-flow should affect default block-level alignment of flex container
@@ -94,6 +95,7 @@ From:     fantasai
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0084.html
 Response: [none needed]
 Closed:   Rejected
+Verified: [commenter is editor]
 ----
 Issue 13.
 Summary:  wrap-reverse is confusing
@@ -157,5 +159,6 @@ Issue 21.
 Summary:  Tables as flex items underdefined
 From:     fantasai
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0385.html
-Open
+Closed:   Accepted
+OPEN NEEDS EDITS
 ----