[css-flexbox-1] Add DoC

Author: fantasai

css-flexbox-1/issues-cr-2018.bsi

@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
+Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-flexbox-1-20181119/
+Title:    CSS Flexible Box Module Level 1
+
+----
+Issue 1.
+Summary:  Clarifications to size computation dependencies
+From:     dbaron
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2890
+Open:     Pending deeper investigation, scope of edits unknown
+Previous: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/issues-cr-2017#issue-14
+----
+Issue 2.
+Summary:  Investigate applying align-content to single-line flex containers
+From:     Tab Atkins and fantasai
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3052
+Open:     Pending Web-compat investigation
+Previous: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/issues-cr-2017#issue-16
+----
+Issue 3.
+Summary:  Baseline alignment of inline flex containers
+From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3416
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3416
+Closed:   Retracted
+----
+Issue 4.
+Summary:  Clarify referent in definite sizes section
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3531
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/dbd98f29f7d4cea59078a03b262c8b75f63ee66a
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 5.
+Summary:  Collapse bullets 1 & 3 in definite sizes section
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3531
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3531#issuecomment-657785333
+Closed:   Invalid
+----
+Issue 6.
+Summary:  Initial values inconsistent with css-align
+From:     Eric Willigers
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3636
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3636#issuecomment-463050318
+Closed:   Deferred
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3636#issuecomment-466987045
+----
+Issue 7.
+Summary:  Include padding in scrollable overflow area
+From:     fantasai
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3665
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3665#issuecomment-484360912
+Closed:   Accepted / OutOfScope
+Verified: Reporter is editor
+----
+Issue 8.
+Summary:  Missing change in changes section
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3668
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3668#issuecomment-624938271
+Resolved: Editorial
+Closed:   Invalid
+----
+Issue 9.
+Summary:  Max-size clamping of specified size is superfluous
+From:     David Grogan
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3669
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3669#issuecomment-484308507
+Closed:   Rejected
+Resolved: Editorial
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3669#issuecomment-484577682
+----
+Issue 10.
+Summary:  Cross-axis max-size not taken into account
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3736
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3736#issuecomment-502849251
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Bugfix
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3736#issuecomment-502854165
+----
+Issue 11.
+Summary:  Example characters are Chinese not Japanese
+From:     ringbell
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3957
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3957#issuecomment-495062702
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3957#issuecomment-495265608
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3957#issuecomment-495303500
+Closed:   Invalid
+Resolved: Editorial
+----
+Issue 12.
+Summary:  Blockification should be based on computed value, not box display
+From:     Emilio Cobos Àlvarez
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4065
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4065#issuecomment-548924024
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0db00e1870bcb74bd820f89beed168514d9a6ec5
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2019Nov/0009.html
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4065#issuecomment-553319697
+----
+Issue 13.
+Summary:  ICB clamping of orthogonal flows shoud apply to flex container itself
+From:     Tab Atkins
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4221
+Open
+----
+Issue 14.
+Summary:  aspect ratio rules should also apply to other content-based sizes
+From:     Tab Atkins
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4226
+Open
+----
+Issue 15.
+Summary:  Definiteness of inflexible item with min-height: auto
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4305
+Open
+---
+Issue 16.
+Summary:  min-height:auto should use "definite" rather than "percentage resolution"
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4310
+Open
+----
+Issue 17.
+Summary:  Should definite flex-basis always make main size definite?
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4311
+Open
+----
+Issue 18.
+Summary:  Do unresolable percentages prevent stretching?
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4312
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4312#issuecomment-531981125
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4525#issuecomment-572762219
+Closed:   Accepted / no spec changes
+Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2020Feb/0008.html
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4312#issuecomment-577645403
+----
+Issue 19.
+Summary:  Implementations don't include item margins in scrolling area
+From:     Takao Baba
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4577#issue-534711823
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4577#issuecomment-624946612
+Closed:   Question
+----
+Issue 20.
+Summary:  Indefiniteness when sizing grid tracks in a flexible flex item
+From:     Oriol Brufau
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4852
+Open
+----
+Issue 21.
+Summary:  Clamp all of specified/transferred/content sizes by max-size at once
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4901
+Open:     Editorial
+----
+Issue 22.
+Summary:  target main size is undefined at beginning of flexible length resolution
+From:     Simon Sapin
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179#issuecomment-642918532
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/91bab66ac6081f971c07f0d0007287439b04e6f7
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179#issuecomment-643255222
+Open
+----
+Issue 23.
+Summary:  Sizing replaced flex items: "perform layout" underdefined
+From:     Simon Sapin
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5188
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5188#issuecomment-642924434
+Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ab0e4fe2142c730374cd106fbabac848c9e3c8f9
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5188#issuecomment-643258449
+----
+Issue 24.
+Summary:  Conflicting definitions of used cross size
+From:     Simon Sapin
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5190
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5190#issuecomment-642929504
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5190#issuecomment-643269004
+Open
+----
+Issue 25.
+Summary:  Clarify aspect ratio calculations box
+From:     Christian Biesinger
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5246
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5246#issuecomment-668848636
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5246#issuecomment-682211322
+----
+Issue 26.
+Summary:  Undefined transferred size suggestion
+From:     David Grogan
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5347
+Open
+----
+Issue 27.
+Summary:  Percentages don't account for gaps
+From:     Jacob Bearce
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5399
+Open:     Wontfix
+----
+Issue 28.
+Summary:  Avoid percentage height quirk in new layout models
+From:     Oriol Brufau
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5545
+Open
+----
+Issue 29.
+Summary:  Initial value of flex-grow incorrect?
+From:     Louis Lazaris
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5602
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5602#issuecomment-706440060
+Closed:   Invalid
+Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5602#issuecomment-706580966
+----
+Issue 30.
+Summary:  Define -webkit- aliases in css-flexbox-1
+From:     Sam Sneddon
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5634
+Open
+----
+Issue 31.
+Summary:  Does definite cross-size from container transfer across ratio?
+From:     Ting-yu Lin
+Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5663
+Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5663#issuecomment-721453016
+Closed:   Accepted
+Resolved: Editorial
+----